Old MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Redford, Sundance Press on For Opening Day

Traveling from New York to Park City may have taken 14 hours, and establishing a functioning Internet connection may have taken 24 hours, but through it all, you have to have known you could not get rid of me that easily.
And so begins the 2006 Sundance Film Festival–breathtakingly immense, ball-shrinkingly cold and exploding today with more than three dozen screenings across eight area venues. Then there are the parties, panels, performances, celebrity jurors (Terrence Howard, making his triumphant return a year after Hustle & Flow) and, of course, an opening day press conference with festival godfather Robert Redford, holding forth on Sundance’s evolution as its namesake institute celebrates its 25th anniversary.

Geoffrey Gilmore and Robert Redford wistfully recall the old days as shared by Friends With Money filmmaker Nicole Holofcener (Photo: STV)

“Your perception of the festival depends on where you sit,” said Redford, meaning philosophically and not in a 25-degree bus shelter across the steeet from the Library Theater. “If you get away from the main heart of the programming, which is basically programming for new voices in film and new filmmakers, it’s about discovery. It’s about discovering the filmmakers by creating the opportunity for them. That’s our focus. So we program this thing as a festival, which means we don’t program it according to partiality. We don’t make that choice. I wouldn’t want that on my shoulders anyway.”
Redford’s remarks–touting the growth of international and documentary cinema in particular–followed an introduction by festival director Geoffrey Gilmore, who managed to score the day’s Sundance-keyword-quota of “work” and “independent” within seconds of sitting down. The pair was joined onstage by Nicole Holofcener, the Sundance alum from way back whose latest film, Friends With Money, opened the festival Thursday night. She led the gathering on a nostalgia trip to the early ’90s, when she emerged from the institute’s writing and directing labs with her clever, assured debut feature, Walking and Talking.
“I was born at Sundance,” Holofcener said. “I have a really bad memory, but I remember panicking because I forgot how to talk to actors. Or I realized I never knew how to talk to actors. And I had these actors looking at me–one liked to rehearse, one didn’t like to rehearse. One was in a bad mood, one was insecure. And there I was, and I think that they sometimes thought I was supposed to know what I was doing, and I kept telling them, ‘No, I was told this was for practice. I was told it’s OK if I don’t know what I’m doing.’ ”
It was at that point that Holofcener said she leaned on her Sundance advisors for the luxury of advice. “I’ve got to just do it my way and not the way I think it might sound ‘intelligent’ or sound like a director,” she said she learned. “It’ll sound like me, and in a way that will get them to do what I want on film. I think that was the most valuable thing in the directing labs, I think–being able to run to these people that I respected and have have them look at me like, ‘You can do this.’ And they’re not my Mom.”
Ah, Sundance. Selective, independent and nurturing. No wonder we put up with all of this fucking snow.

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon