Old MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Standing-Room-Only Premiere Opens NY Asian Film Festival (Sort Of)


I guess technically I was wrong yesterday when I mentioned that the New York Asian Film Festival was kicking off Wednesday night with Takashi Yamazaki’s epic post-WWII drama Always–Sunset on Third Street. Rather, the screening at the Japan Society was something of a warm-up for Friday’s official opening–a sold-out, buzzed-about, turn-away-dozens-at-the-front-door test spin, but a warm-up nevertheless.
Those with the good fortune to get through the door were treated to an introduction by Takashi himself (above), whose Best Director prize was one of 13 Japanese Academy Awards Always claimed in 2005. He explained that he originally had little interest in making the film, but a producer obsessed with 1950s Tokyo would not take “iiya” for an answer.
“Mr. (Shuji) Abe had produced my first two films–this would become my third film,” Takashi said through a translator. “He told me, ‘Only you–because you have been a talented visual effects supervisor and director–you’re the only one who can recreate 1950s Japan today.’ Which, of course, really upset me because he wasn’t buying my skills as a director at all but just as a technician. So I said, ‘Never, never, never will I make this film.’ Even as it was, people around me kept saying, ‘Just go back to doing visual effects,’ which was mind of an insult to my films. So in the midst of that kind of uncertainty and anxiety, for a producer to say, ‘I need your technical mastery’ as opposed to my directorial mastery was very insulting.”
By that point, I was wondering if the translator had her tongue as far into her cheek and Takashi’s was in his own. “He was so obstinate and so persistent,” the director continued, ” and he had let me make two movies that I’d wanted to make, so I figured that it was about time that I owed him this one. So I made this film. And now that it’s turned into such a monster hit, I feel kind of conflicted emotionally.”
The good news for anyone shut out of last night’s barnburner is that Always will re-screen July 1 at the Imaginasian. The bad news, of course, is that Takashi will have jetted back to Japan by that time, and you will be deprived the winning introduction recounting his hometown stardom and his parents’ consideration of him as a “golden prince.” But like I told you yesterday: Do not believe the hype–not even the directors’. This is about the movies.

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon