Old MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

'The Turn of a Dime': Orlando Bloom Chats Up 'Haven' in NYC

Orlando Bloom was in town Thursday to promote his new film Haven, a mystifying fusion of Romeo and Juliet, money intrigue and unapologetically trashy B-movie that opens Sept. 15. Written and directed on the cheap by then-24-year-old Frank E. Flowers (yes, really) in his native Cayman Islands, Haven interweaves the stories of Shy (Bloom), a poor white kid who falls in love with a rich island girl Andrea (Zoe Saldana), whose brother (Anthony Mackie) juggles his disapproval with an earnest Quest for Gangsterdom, which overlaps with the indiscretions of petty criminal Fritz (Victor Rasuk), who is casing a rich American (Bill Paxton) who fled the feds in Miami with his impressionable teenage daughter (Agnes Bruckner). Everything comes together like a bulky, poorly wrapped Christmas present worth studying for its incompetence and worth opening for the guilty pleasure insde; the ratio of sultry cast members to sensical narrative here ranks at a deciedly underachieving five-to-zero.

Sea fairer: Actor/producer Orlando Bloom with Zoe Saldana in Haven (Photo: Yari Film Group)

But you cannot say Flowers did not try; his camera swerves like a speed freak and cuts hot and fast, not an entirely unsuccessful (or original) stylistic exercise that helps viewers defer the question “What the fuck am I watching?” if only because there is just never enough time; Flowers is jump-cutting months ahead, or across town, or across oceans, or into oceans with lovers Bloom and Saldana. After 40 minutes or so, it is not impossible to appreciate or even enjoy Haven for what it is: a soap opera with teeth. Or maybe just really, really foxy dentures.
I asked Bloom and Flowers (I’m telling you, this stuff writes itself) from whence and how exactly they developed the film’s stormy “style.” “The one advantage you do have with bening young and having your first film is saying ‘I don’t know,’ or ‘What do you think?’ and not have ego get in the way of it or vice versa,” Flowers told me. “As we went through, it was really all about that–all about collaborating. As far as the style of the actual film, it’s like in movies like Amores Perros, movies like City of God, there’s a certain disregard in the film. They just say, ‘Let’s do it.’ Things drop out of foucs. It’s just so aggressive and so real and so raw and a lot of times, when you don’t have the money or the time to do three or four angles, all your actors kind of rise to the occasion. It was really an amazing experience, and I was a little spoiled by it. These guys would get it all in one or two takes, and they’d be like, ‘Aren’t you going to do some coverage?’ I’m like, ‘No that’s great.’ It was an amazing moment. ‘I could shoot it again if you wanna spend an hour lighting it, but it was brilliant and I have it, and we’ll jump cut if the continuity isn’t 100 percent there because the moment is true and the moment is pure.’ ”
“And that was so exciting as an actor,” Bloom interjected, “because of the script, and they way he adapted it on the turn of a dime, the way that he was that flexible as a director working with him. You know? He was 24 years old! But he had a real confidence and a real air of, ‘This is what I want–I got it.’ And what can I say? I believed him. It took a few turns to really believe it, but it was exciting. It was an exciting process. It was a dialogue; it wasn’t a one-way street. Neither of us have got egos that mean we can’t talk about it. We want to make a movie and get it done together.”
Bloom, who co-produced the film, passed the buck when asked why Haven languished for two years on its distributor’s shelf. “That’s kind of a Bob Yari question,” Bloom said, referring to the mogul-ish, Oscar-deprived Crash bankroller whose eponymous distributing arm has pushed a half-dozen titles of varying quality (Winter Passing, Find Me Guilty, The Illusionist among others) into the market in 2006. In full producer mode, however, he modestly added that now is Haven‘s time, then thanked the press and left the room. Harvey would be proud.

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon