MCN Columnists
Leonard Klady

By Leonard Klady Klady@moviecitynews.com

90 Million American Can’t Be Wrong …

February 4 , 2007
Weekend Estimates
Domestic Market Share

The Messengers didn’t require Western Union to top weekend movie going charts with an estimated $14.8 million. The horror yarn was followed by another freshman entry – Because I Said So – that grossed $13.1 million. Otherwise it was a relatively quiet frame with distributors giving a wide berth to Sunday’s Super Bowl conclave that’s historically pummeled film attendance.

Niche activity also applied caution with the drama Constellation opening on a limited-wide basis and generating less than a $1,000 per engagement average. Exclusive run titles could not generate more than passable results with Factory Girl displaying the best returns with roughly $30,000 from three theaters.

Overall business sank significantly despite an impressive volume of product in the marketplace.

Super Bowl weekend once again kicked off with a chiller that comparatively speaking cooled beside past entries. The Messengers bow while a testament to the commercial viability of the genre lagged significantly behind last year’s When a Stranger Calls that opened to $21.6 million.

Expectations were modest for the Mandy Moore-Diane Keaton family comedy Because I Said So and results were slight better than anticipated. However, it was far from a break out and will likely be swept out of the marketplace by new releases in the coming weeks.

The session generated approximately $91 million in ticket sales that translated into a sizeable 24% tumble from seven days earlier. It was also 14% behind 2006 when the aforementioned When a Stranger Calls debuted and Big Momma’s House 2 was second ranked with $13.6 million. The first month of 2007 is already trailing last year by 8% with no immediate impression that upcoming releases will affect a turnaround.

The football finale translated into steep declines for last weekend’s new titles and most of the movies targeted at the 18-25 set that dominates frequent movie going. Marking on the curve the shake up was less extreme for up market, niche and ethnic appeal fare.

The mass of product attempting to capitalize on Oscar mania in the next three weeks have overall experienced less than stellar results. The postmortem on Dreamgirls is apt to be fascinating and uncomplimentary while Pan’s Labyrinth is likely to be viewed as the greatest beneficiary of the golden statuette’s aura; especially should it emerge as a winner in the foreign-language and a below-the-line category. Venus is also shaping up as a movie whose award strategy that’s been fumbled though the potential for a second act looms should Peter O’Toole take home an Oscar.

The situation confronting such films as The Last King of Scotland, The Queen and The Departed (and to a less extent Notes on a Scandal and Letters from Iwo Jima) is that their appreciated value doesn’t translate in the sort of obvious fashion of past contenders. Nonetheless each of the films will see significant boosts in such areas as foreign exposure, DVD sales and in their library value in the immediate and distant future.

Constellation zeroed in on urban ethnic audiences with less than stellar results of roughly $230,000 from 238 venues. And while the $87,500 gross of the 1960s Soho art scene Factory Girl was encouraging, it lacked the dynamism to ensure wide expansion. An Unreasonable Man, a portrait of Ralph Nadar, had solid returns of $9,410 from a single site but the initial forays for American indies Puccini for Beginners and The Situation were unimpressive.

– Leonard Klady

Weekend Estimates – January 26-28, 2007

Title
Distributor
Gross (average)
% change
Theaters
Cume
The Messengers
Sony
14.8 (5,860)
2528 14.8
Because I Said So
Uni
13.1 (5,190)
2526 13.1
Epic Movie
Fox
8.1 (2,860)
-56% 2840 29.3
Night at the Museum
Fox
6.7 (2,220)
-30% 3003 225.3
Smokin’ Aces
Uni
6.3 (2,850)
-57% 2219 25
Stomp the Yard
Sony
4.0 (1,860)
-48% 2169 55.8
Dreamgirls
Par
4.0 (1,430)
-41% 2797 92.7
Pan’s Labyrinth
Picturehouse
3.7 (3,440)
-22% 1082 21.7
The Pursuit of Happyness
Sony
3.1 (1,370)
-39% 2233 157.3
Catch and Release
Sony
2.7 (1,650)
-65% 1622 12
The Queen
Miramax
2.6 (1,400)
-35% 1850 45.4
The Departed
WB
2.4 (1,630)
-30% 1453 128.7
Freedom Writers
Par
1.9 (980)
-47% 1915 34.2
Letter from Iwo Jima
WB
1.7 (2,400)
-7% 720 7.5
Babel
Par Vantage
1.7 (1,530)
-35% 1090 29.7
Notes on a Scandal
Fox Searchligh
1.7 (2,430)
-36% 682 11.7
The Last King of Scotland
Fox Searchligh
1.3 (2,410)
-24% 528 9.6
Children of Men
Uni
1.2 (1,410)
-46% 829 32.8
The Hitcher
Focus
1.1 (760)
-69% 1496 15.6
Arthur and the Invisibles
MGM
.94 (760)
-45% 1245 12.7
Blood Diamond
WB
.91 (1,430)
-26% 635 54
Charlotte’s Web
Par
.86 (810)
-43% 1058 80
Volver
Sony Class/Se
.66 (1,020)
-43% 644 10.8
Blood and Chocolate
MGM
.57 (480)
-73% 1200 3.1
Happy Feet
WB
.55 (960)
-40% 575 192.7
The Painted Veil
WIP
.51 (1,780)
-27% 287 5.6
Weekend Total ($500,000+ Films)
$87.10
% Change (Last Year)
-14%
% Change (Last Week)
-24%
Also debuting/expanding
Venus
Miramax
.37 (3,820)
7% 96 1.2
Constellation
Bigger Pics
.23 (970)
238 0.23
Factory Girl
MGM
.09 (29,170)
3 0.09
An Unreasonable Man
IFC
9,410 (9,410)
1 0.01
Puccini for Beginners
Strand
7,840 (7,840)
2 0.01
The Situation
Shadow
5,200 (2,600)
2 0.01
The Pit
Kino
1,950 (1,950)
1 0.01

Domestic Market Share: Jan 1 – Dec 31, 2006

Distributor (releases)
Gross
Percentage
% Chang
Rank ’05
Sony (33)
1718.1
18.60%
87%
5
Buena Vista (25)
1474.4
16.00%
60%
4
Fox (28)
1398.6
15.20%
3%
2
Warner Bros. (25)
1065.9
11.60%
-23%
1
Paramount (18)
949.9
10.30%
15%
6
Universal (21)
816.6
8.90%
-19%
3
Lions Gate (18)
333.8
3.60%
17%
10
New Line (13)
253.2
2.70%
-40%
7
Weinstein Co. (14)
226.5
2.40%
383%
17
Focus (13)
184.8
2.00%
15%
12
MGM (11)
166.8
1.80%
-9%
11
Fox Searchlight (14)
165.6
1.80%
62%
14
Sony Classics (23)
59.3
0.60%
-6%
15
FreeStyle (9)
56
0.60%
N/A
N/A
Other * (290)
361.6
3.90%
-9%
9231.1
100.00%
3.80%
* DreamWorks ranked seventh; Miramax ninth in 2005

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Klady

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon