By Ray Pride Pride@moviecitynews.com

Review: You Wont Miss Me (views)

In 2009 Williamsburg, Shelly, a woman of 23 or so, (Stella Schnabel) contends with intense desires, average expectations, quotidian disappointments. Shelly’s inner life is suggested by a voice-over that’s as much interior monologue as diary entry or recitation to a therapist, as well as a visual style that works in several bold formats as well as an intermittent score by Will Bates that uses a percussive tattoo like an accelerated heartbeat, shared by Stella and the film itself, in the same fashion Jon Brion did with his music for Punch-Drunk Love. Ry Russo-Young’s second feature, You Wont Miss Me (sic), at first glance traffics in contemporary low-budget, digital video idioms, but in fact is a well-constructed, sharply observed, unsentimental modern-moment “Alice in Wonderland.” The final shot of the movie is a gorgeous slap, prompting that reference, ending with just the right note of the character’s knack for provocation but also her essentially uncentered existence. There are elements I wouldn’t cite as influences, but as parallels that rang true to me. In the nonjudgmental approach to depicting Shelly’s instability but also youthful female sexuality, a fond comparison could be made to the sensual nightdream of Claire Denis’ Friday Night.


A mix of vigor and languor in a recurrent image of Shelly on the back of a motorcycle, with helmet on, but moving her hands and arms as if to take flight, evokes Hou Hsiao-hsien’s way of observing his beloved, mercurial female characters, especially an image in 2001’s Millennium Mambo of Shu Qi lost in reverie as she rises through a sunroof of a car gliding through curves of nighttime Taipei and waves her arms in similar fashion. And I’m quite serious in comparing the palettes and editing style to the fistful of scenes that have been shown from Orson Welles’ as-yet-uncompleted The Other Side of the Wind. There are brief appearances by filmmaking colleagues like Greta Gerwig and Joe Swanberg of the “new talkies” confederation. But upon first viewing, You Wont doesn’t feel derivative, flowing with a confidence that was present in Russo-Young’s first feature, Orphans, but comes fully into its own here. And star-co-writer Schnabel gives Shelly a strong presence, but also embodies fragile flower in full bloom in a bright shiny neon city.
There are quietly sophisticated elements throughout, from the pacing of Shelly’s moods and sometimes-brutal confrontations with female friends as well as her young dates (scruffy bedheads to a man) she admires or wants, to a compositional motif of triangular elements (a ladder on a mostly-bare stage, a clock’s hands at 3:40, hands raised above heads) that imply a constant danger of an emotional folding-in. Some information is sketched in with an offhand stroke: Shelly’s quick-bitten fingers; Williamsburg shown by a glimpse of Peter Luger’s sign as a couple turn a corner and by a cab ride across that strange fabled bridge. The dialogue is naturalistic but with sweet quirks: “Not now but right now”; “It smells like babies covered with flowers”; a director speed-describes his “multidisciplinary multimedia extravaganzas”; “At least I don’t come across as a cry for help”; “You’re one of those people who’s gonna kill themselves in five years so I don’t want to say anything more and implicate myself.” I could go on—even the less-than-lucid characters are observantly spoken—but I’ll end with this image, which is a bookend for me with the challenging final shot. Shelly and a friend go to Atlantic City to see a band whose lead singer she likes, wants. (Onstage, the guy has clown dots of rouge on his cheeks, feminizing his already androgynous features.) She and her friend fight, bitterly, but there’s a moment in the band’s room at their hotel where he’s fallen asleep. He’s folded up, jackknifed slightly more than going fetal, and his pack of Parliaments is on the bed inside this triangular composition. That’s beautiful form, but Shelly watches him sleep. Watches him sleep. Sweet boy who might smell like a baby and cigarettes, not nearly the Dionysian ideal she watched prance onstage. Behind her gaze, we hear the TV that’s on in the room. It’s an ad, a commercial for a lost puppy shelter. The heart breaks. Shelly’s eyes are wide and still. The song choices throughout are strong and suit each scene where they’re placed, but You Wont Miss Me is as much pop music as movie: lyrical, simple, with refrains, and yet in its final glance, unresolved.

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon