By MCN Editor editor@moviecitynews.com

CINEMA EYE NAMES 11 NONFICTION SHORT FILM FINALISTS FOR 2012 AWARDS

October 11, 2011

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

New York, NY – Eleven films from six countries have been named as finalists for the 2012 Cinema Eye Honor for Outstanding Achievement in Nonfiction Short Filmmaking. Five nominees, selected from the 11 finalists, will be named on October 26, 2011 when nominees for the 2012 Cinema Eye Honors are announced in London, England at an event hosted by Sheffield Doc/Fest, a key partner of the Cinema Eye Honors.

Among the finalists are two previous Cinema Eye nominees: Deborah Stratman, who was nominated for the Cinematography award in 2010 for O’ER THE LAND, and the late Tim Hetherington, who was nominated for two awards in 2011 for RESTREPO.

This is the second year that Cinema Eye has presented an award for Nonfiction Short Filmmaking. Last year the award went to THE POODLE TRAINER, directed by Vance Malone.

Finalists for the Short Filmmaking award were determined in voting by top short film/documentary programmers from international film festivals. This year’s nominations committees are chaired by Sean Farnell, the former Director of Programming at Hot Docs. Committee members include Hussain Currimbhoy (Sheffield Doc/Fest), Sarafina DiFelice (Hot Docs), Ben Fowlie (Camden International Film Festival), Ted Mott (Full Frame), Veton Nurkollari (DokuFest Kosovo), Sky Sitney (Silverdocs) and Kim Yutani (Sundance Film Festival).

A jury will watch all 11 films and select five nominees and a winner, which will be announced at the 5th Annual Cinema Eye Honors on January 11, 2012 at the Museum of the Moving Image in New York City.

2012 Cinema Eye Honors Short Film Finalists:

Bathing Micky (MICKY BADER) (Sweden/Denmark)

Directed by Frida Kempff

Diary (United Kingdom)

Directed by Tim Hetherington

Guanape Sur (Italy)

Directed by Janos Richter

Il Capo (The Chief) (Italy)

Directed by Yuri Ancarani

Incident by a Bank (Sweden)

Directed by Ruben Ostlund

Minka (USA)

Directed by Davina Pardo

Out of Reach (POZA ZASIEGIEM) (Poland)

Directed by Jakub Stozek

Poster Girl (USA)

Directed by Sara Nesson

Ray’s Birds (USA)

Directed by Deborah Stratman

This Chair is Not Me (United Kingdom)

Directed by Andy Taylor Smith

Tussilago (Sweden)

Directed by Jonas Odell

Esther Robinson and AJ Schnack are the Co-Chairs of Cinema Eye; Nathan Truesdell is Cinema Eye’s Producer. Sean Farnel is the Chair of the Cinema Eye Nominations Committee. Andrea Meditch chairs the Cinema Eye Advisory Board and Laura Poitras chairs the Cinema Eye Filmmaker Advisory Board.

# # #

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon