By MCN Editor editor@moviecitynews.com

INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY ASSOCIATION ANNOUNCES PARE LORENTZ DOCUMENTARY FUND GRANTS

For Immediate Release

Four Documentary Films To Receive $75,000 In Grants

Los Angeles, CA — The International Documentary Association (IDA) today announced the four feature-length documentary films selected to receive a total of $75,000 from the newly established Pare Lorentz Documentary Fund. The Fund was created with support from The New York Community Trust to illuminate pressing issues in the United States and to honor the legacy of the landmark documentary filmmaker Pare Lorentz.

IDA received grant applications from 165 filmmakers from across the U.S. and around the world, and submissions were judged on their objective research, artful storytelling, strong visual style, and high production values, as well as the reflection of the spirit and nature of Pare Lorentz’s work.

“The International Documentary Association recognizes the growing importance of documentary filmmaking to cultures and societies, and the increasing financial needs of those who create this art form,” said Michael Lumpkin, IDA’s Executive Director. “With the support of The New York Community Trust and the Elizabeth Meyer Lorentz Fund, IDA is able to further its support of the documentary filmmaking community.”

The four productions receiving grants will shed light on a variety of critical issues including the coerced sterilization of Mexican-origin women during the 1960s and 70s, the future of America’s middle class, the country’s failings in the war on poverty and the healing of our nation’s racial divide.

Productions receiving Pare Lorentz Documentary Fund grants:

¿Más Bebés? ($20,000)
Renee Tajima-Peña, Producer/Director

¿MásBebés? poses a provocative question: Was the maternity ward at Los Angeles County-USC Medical Center a border checkpoint for unborn babies?  The feature documentary uncovers the untold history of Mexican-origin women who allege they were coercively sterilized at the hospital during the1960s and 70s.

As Goes Janesville ($20,000)
Brad Lichtenstein, Producer/Director

First GM closes. Then related business shut down. Next, the Governor of Wisconsin tries to kill unions. What is the future for America’s middle class? As Goes Janesville has the answers, and they’re not so good.

Rise and Fall of ACORN: America’s Most Controversial Anti-poverty Organization ($20,000)
Sam Pollard, Producer/Director

At the height of its power, ACORN, an organization devoted to fighting poverty in the United States, is destroyed. In a story stranger than fiction involving embezzlement, a fake pimp, and a right wing conspiracy plot, Rise and Fall of ACORN examines how our nation’s war against poverty is really fought.

American Village ($15,000)
Mary Posatko,  Co-Director/Co-Producer, Emily Topper, Co-Director/Co-Producer

Almost forty years after their father is shot by three black teenagers in Baltimore, a white family of thirteen looks for the murderers. The search forces a confrontation between America’s white middle class and black urban “underclass,” but they discover a shared desire to heal. Filmed by the victim’s granddaughter.

Pare Lorentz Documentary Fund Finalists include:

American Arab – Usama Alshaibi , Director/Producer

Best Kept Secret –  Samantha Buck, Director and Danielle DiGiacomo, Producer

Broken Heart Land – Jeremy Stulberg & Randy Stulberg – Directors/Producers

Can’t Stop the Water – Rebecca Ferris, Director

Charge – Mike Plunkett , Director and Anna Farrell, Producer

El Sistema USA – Anthony Drazan, Director and Jaimie Bernstein & Elizabeth Kling, Producers

Gabe Tomorrow – Francine Cavanaugh & Adams Wood, Directors/Producers

Gideon’s Army – Dawn Porter, Director and Julie Goldman, Producer

Green Shall Overcome – Megan Gelstein, Director/Producer

Jessica Gonzales vs. the United States of America – Katia Maguire & April Hayes, Directors/Producers

Seed – Sandy McLeod, Director

Untitled Kivalina Documentary – Jenni Monet, Director/Producer

The Pare Lorentz Documentary Fund is a program of IDA’s Filmmaker Support Services, which provides fiscal sponsorship support to over 300 documentary film productions.  Proposals for the Fund are accepted annually in April.

http://www.documentary.org/parelorentz for more information.

About the International Documentary Association

Founded in 1982, the International Documentary Association (IDA) is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization that supports documentary filmmaking worldwide. At IDA, we believe that the power and artistry of the documentary art form are vital to cultures and societies globally, and we exist to serve the needs of those who create this art form. IDA is the portal into the world of documentary filmmaking. We provide up-to-date news, information and community through our website, documentary.org, our various special events, and our quarterly publication, Documentary Magazine. Our main program areas are Advocacy, Filmmaker Services, Education and Public Programs & Events.

About The New York Community Trust

Through the generosity of New Yorkers past and present, The New York Community Trust makes grants for a range of charitable activity important to the well-being and vitality of our city. We’ve helped make donors’ charitable dreams come true since 1924. We ended 2009 with assets of $1.7 billion in nearly 2,000 charitable funds, and made grants totaling $123 million. Grants made from these funds meet the changing needs of children, youth, and families; aid in community development; improve the environment; promote health; assist people with special needs; and support education, arts, and human justice. In addition to making grants to a broad range of nonprofit agencies, The Trust responds to urgent problems in the City by bringing people together, working with other funders, and issuing publications to help illuminate issues and explore their solutions.

About Pare Lorentz

Pare Lorentz was an American original. His documentary films The Plow That Broke The Plains (1936), The River (1938) and The Fight for Life (1940) were among the first to demonstrate that films can educate and rally a nation around its history, its greatness, and its problems. Both The Plow That Broke the Plains and The River, made in support of Roosevelt’s New Deal, are considered seminal works in the development of the American documentary and earned Lorentz international acclaim.

#  # #

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon