By MCN Editor editor@moviecitynews.com

Millennium Entertainment and the Colon Cancer Alliance Join Forces to Promote Colon Cancer Prevention

Kate Hudson and Gael Garcia Bernal Star in New Film, A Little Bit of Heaven, That Uses Humor to Cope with a Colon Cancer Diagnosis

LOS ANGELES, May 9, 2012 — The Colon Cancer Alliance
and Millennium Entertainment have partnered on the new romantic comedy,
A Little Bit of Heaven, to bring attention to the importance of getting
screened for colon cancer — the second leading cause of cancer death
in the U.S., but one that is largely preventable.

Millennium Entertainment’s new film features an all-star cast including
Kate Hudson, Whoopi Goldberg and Gael García Bernal. Easy-going
career woman Marley Corbett (Hudson) finds love with her doctor Julian
Goldstein (Bernal) after discovering she has terminal colon cancer. A
Little Bit of Heaven opens in theaters and On Demand this May.

In an effort to communicate the importance of screening and early
detection, Millennium Entertainment will feature the Colon Cancer
Alliance’s “Screening Saves Lives!” PSA at the end of the film. The PSA
will be seen on DVD and Blu-ray releases beginning June 12, 2012.

The Colon Cancer Alliance applauds the filmmakers’ decision to show a
strong, vibrant young woman battling this disease. “We are hopeful that
the film will encourage people of all ages to start talking about colon
cancer and the importance of screening with their families, friends and
doctors,” stated Andrew Spiegel, Chief Executive Officer of the Colon
Cancer Alliance.

While most often affecting those over the age of 50, colon cancer can
strike anyone at any time. Risk factors such as having a family history
of colon cancer or polyps or a personal history of inflammatory bowel
disease can increase one’s risk of developing this disease.

The Colon Cancer Alliance (CCA) is the leading national patient
advocacy organization dedicated to increasing colon cancer screening
rates and survivorship. The CCA is an active, caring community that
provides hope and support to patients and their families, while saving
lives through screening, access, awareness, advocacy and research.
Visit www.ccalliance.org.

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon