MCN Columnists
Mike Wilmington

By Mike Wilmington Wilmington@moviecitynews.com

Wilmington on DVDs: The Devil Inside; My Perestroika; Who’s Minding the Store?; Who’s Got the Action?; The Spiders

The Devil Inside (One Star)

U. S.: William Brent Bell, 2012 (Paramount)

Just how bad can a movie be that grosses 34 million dollars on its first weekend? Pretty damned bad, as you’ll find out quickly if you dip into The Devil Inside — the latest entry in the found-footage horror or mocko-shockumetary sweepstakes that began in earnest with the 1999 box office success of The Blair Witch Project, and has since been responsible for The Last Exorcism, (Rec) and (Rec) 2,  Cloverfield (the one really good one), another Blair Witch project, a bunch of Paranormal Activity movies, and probably a few more cheapo gore fests you’d be a dope to pay money to see.

 
Visually ugly, dramatically ridiculous, thematically shoddy, psychologically inert, emotionally squalid, yet financially flabbergasting (The Devil Inside’s 34 million dollar opening weekend grosses, came for a movie budgeted at about a million), this bloody little freak show tries to squeeze The Exorcist through Blair Witch Project and Paranormal Activity, and comes up with the same old jiggling-camera, screaming-actor bloodbath, interspersed with baptisms, exorcism classes, and trips to the psycho ward at the Vatican hospital for the cinematically insane. 
 
In The Devil Inside, the horrors begin right away in the credits, when the movie explains that we are about to see footage mysteriously discovered, recording a series of  mysterious events, which have left everyone who has seen this footage (carefully cut together by professional editors) in a state of inexplicable mystification. If any of you out there have any knowledge of what all this mysterious footage means, or why it was put together, or what happens in the movie, or why hordes of moviegoers paid 34 million dollars to see it on the openinfg weekend (and didn’t angrily demand refunds), you are advised to immediately contact the producers of The Devil Inside — who may themselves in a state of utter mystification.
 
The prologue also helpfully informs us that the Vatican does not believe in exorcism and had nothing to do with this picture, something that should clear up all those nasty rumors about Pope Benedict’s penchant for Dario Argento movies. Then, as we watch, presumably breathless with terror, Devil Inside’s director-co-writer William Brent Bell and his producer/co writer Mathew Peterman, open up with a cryptic 911 call, in which a dazed-sounding woman confesses to several murders, and we are then taken on a jiggling hand-held camera tour of a sordid-looking, disheveled house where three people lie dead, all smeared with their own blood, which also covers the walls.
 
This messy carnage, we‘re told, occurred after a botched exorcism resulted in the seemingly possessed Maria Rossi (Suzan Crowley) running amok, killing all the exorcists and then calling up 911 to summon the police and the jiggling cameraman. This may sound like the movie quickly hitting its nadir, but this repulsive scene is actually one of Devil Inside’s high points, only exceeded by the double-jointed contortionist act later executed in an asylum by body double Pixie Le Knot.
 
Decades later, Isabella Rossi (Fernanda Andrade), Maria’s model-caliber daughter, sets off for Rome, under gray and cloudy skies, for an overseas visit to the Vatican university and the Vatican mental hospital, accompanied by documentarian Michael (Ionut Grama), who has another jiggling handheld camera and follows Isabella everywhere, perhaps under the delusion that she is Isabella Rossellini. The movie’s actual cinematographer, Gonzalo Amat, seems to be following Michael with his own jiggling handheld camera, and Michael occasionally sets his camera down and photographs himself, but not Gonzalo.
 
Soon, amidst all this jiggling and these gray vistas, and an occasional splatter of blood, accompanied by loud clanging noises and further mystification, Isabella hooks up with two enterprising English-speaking priests and free-lance exorcists — Simon Quaterman (Ben Rawlings) and David Keane (Evan Helmuth). They sneak her and Michael into the hospital to see Maria, where everybody endures allegedly shocking scenes of demonic possession, foul language worthy of Linda Blair‘s Regan, horrific exposition and double-jointed displays where the limber Ms. Pixie ties herself into Le Knot. (See picture below.)
 
NO SPOILER ALERT
 
It’s all pretty horrible, though not very convincing or interesting, unless you’re partial to sordid rip-offs of The Exorcist recorded by jiggling cameras. I’d go on with this synopsis, but, hey, you know, the devil with it. Enough is enough. The Devil Inside also has a really annoying surprise ending, which isn’t even worth spoiling.
 
END OF NON-SPOILER
 
One of the advantages of this whole found-footage school of horror movies, besides the fact that they‘re cheap and you reap huge profits on them, is that you can get away with bad cinematography that looks as if it was shot by amateurs, but here is tolerated because it’s supposed to look like bad photography shot by amateurs, recording the actions of non-actors, working without scripts. Therefore, the moviemakers have an alibi for everything, except the weather.
 

So much for “art.“ Maybe it’s The Devil Inside and its makers who know what audiences really want to see. Cinematography that looks amateurish. Acting that looks like non-acting. A script that seems unwritten. Contortionist acts. Mocko-Shockumentaries. Blood on the walls. Devils in the hospital. Corpses strewn hither and thither. Zombies and demons running amok. And holding it all together: jiggling camerawork, inexplicable mystification and an overpowering sense that your time is being throughly wasted. Now, that’s entertainment!

My Perestroika (Two and a Half Stars)

U.S.A.: Robin Hessman, 2011 

Robin Hessman’s documentary about one of the most momentous political events of the 20th century — the collapse of the Soviet Union ad the seeming end of the Cold War — makes it look puzzlingly unmomentous, almost mundane. Hessman, an American, who worked in Russia during the ‘90s on their version of “Sesame Street,” focuses on five Russians, including four ex-schoolmates, and follows them from the ‘80s to now: though the traumas and upheavals of Gorbachev, Yeltsin, glasnost, perestroika, and finally the dissolution of the USSR.

The quintet Hessman builds her movie around are Olga Durikova, once the class beauty, now a single mother who works for a billiards company, Ruslan Stupin, a ex-punk rock star (with the group NAIV) who’s now a subway/street musician, Andrei Yevgrafov, a successful entrepreneur who runs a chain of posh western-style men’s wear stores. and two history teachers, the husband and wife Borya and Lyuba Meyerson. Some of them yearn a little for the past (and its security), some are delighted by the change. Almost all of them are too busy to focus much on politics.

 My Perestroikais not memorably shot or edited, but its human material makes it sometimes fascinating. At the end, even with the revelations or intimations (or are knowledge from elsewhere) that the new Russia is corrupt and violent, and might eventually be a threat as the old Russia was, one is amazed by how quiet and, in the end, non-bloody, and how seemingly inevitable, the fall of Communism finally was. (Russian and English, with subtitles)

 

Who’s Minding the  Store? (Three Stars)

U.S.: Frank Tashlin, 1963 (Three Stars) (Olive)

Jerry Lewis, that’s who. Without Dean. And since this Frank Tashlin-written-and-directed farce — set in a department store that Jerry, as the well-meaning but  accident-prone  Norman Phiffler, systematically demolishes —  dates from Lewis’ biggest commercial (and even artistic) period, the early ’60s, that means we’re going to see plenty of the man the French (or some of the French) call M. Le Crazy, doing his thing: all-out slapstick, spazzy chaos and wild mugging.

Jerry, that is, Norman, tended to be a bit more of a lady-killer when Dean Martin wasn’t around (sometimes even when he was) and in this romantic slapstick marathon, Norman hass won the heart and body of  Barbara Tuttle (Jill St. John),  gorgeous elevator girl at Tuttle’s Department store (this and other plot elements in Store, including Ray Walston in a corporate sneak role, seem to owe something  to Billy Wilder’s The Apartment).

Barbara, unbeknownst to Norman, is the daughter of the store owners, the incompatible  Tuttles: dictator harridan Pheobe (Agnes Moorehead) and milquetoast Tuttle (John McGiver again). So, when he’s hired by Tuttle’s and Pheobe, hip to the romance, tries to prove him an idiot; Norman unoftunately cooperates. (His greatest debaces involves a vacuum cleaner, with a blimp-like bag, that runs Lewisishly amok.)

Jerry Lewis is a matter of taste, of course, though I first developed the taste for him and Dean, as an impressionable kid of ten or so, which is just the right time. Besides he was only a year away from The Nutty Professor when he made this movie, the kind of show that unwittingly puts words like “madcap” and “romp” and “zany”  and “Lady! Lady!” in your head.  Well, what the hell: Vive Le Crazy!

Who’s Got the Action? (Two and a Half Stars)

U/S.: Daniel Mann, 1962 (Olive)

Dean Martin, that’s who. Sans Jerry Lewis.

(As I’m sure you know, “sans” is French for “without.”)  Here, suave smoothie Italiano Dino is playing a hopeless gambling addict married to Lana Turner, who devises a pretty ridiculous but strangely effective sceeme to try to break the racetrack habit, and teams up with Dean’s sometimes amorous co-worker Eddie Albert to pull it off — incurring the confusion of a  fellow bettors (John McGover again) and the wrath of gsngsgter/gambling czar Walter Matthau. (It’s a sort of silly role, but Matthau steals all his scenes again.

Dean could be a bit more romantic when he wasn’t yoked to Jerry (That’s amore), and here he not only has Lana, pitching woo and anti-parimutual activity, but the unusually good cast above. (Paul Ford, Nita Talbot and Jack Albertson are also around.) Jack Rose produced and wrote, from a novel by Alexander Rose. The director is the sometimes more serious Daniel Mann (The Rose Tattoo).

Dean, like Jerry, was at his commerical (and even artistic) zenith in the late ’50s and early 60s, and it really is a shame they never got together again except for that brief hug engineered by Frank Sinatra at Lewis’  March of Dimes telethon. Too fast, too fleeting. Maybe Billy Wilder should have cast them in tandem after Peter Sellers’ heart attack in Kiss Me, Stupid opened up a part. (Jerry couldn’t have mugged more than Ray Walston. Ah, no, wouldn’t have worked.) In any case, when I was ten or so, they made me laugh. Like crazy.

 

The Spiders (Three Stars)

German: Fritz Lang, 1919-1920 (Kino Classics)

Fritz Lang (M, Metropolis, Die Nibelungen) was a master of horror, crime and adventure, and he combines them all — along with a dark touch of romance and a smidgen of humor– in this epic movie tale of lost treasure, exotic Peruvian climes, a daring adventurer (Carl de Vogt as the almost insanely courageous explorer from San Francisco, Kay Hoog), a band of ruthless criminals who tunnel under Chinatown and make up the international gang  The Spiders, the priceless and elusive Buddha’s Head Diamond, the beauteous sun priestess Naela (Lil Dagover), and one of the more murderous of all femme fatales, the busty but perfidious Lio Sha (Ressel Orla).

This spectacular black and white silent movie was released in two episodes (both in this DVD) — Part One: The Golden Sea (1919) and Part Two: The Diamond Ship (1920) — and it was quite obviously influenced by Louis Feuillade’s French crime serials  Judex, Fantomas and Les Vampires, which are better, but not by much. Serial followers with campier tastes might prefer the jovial, high-spirited nonsense of  American cliff-hangers like The Perils of Pauline, but even considering The Spiders’ lack of humor, it’s easy to see that both Lang and Feuillade are superior artists, and that Lang would grow into an even more important one.

Only Hitler and the Nazis, worse monsters and more evil criminals than The Spiders, could drive out Lang and the other German and Austrian film noir greats to Hollywood, stopping his rise in his own country. But these remnants of high adventure remain. Confusion to The Spiders, and to their Nazi counterparts! (Silent movie with intertitles and music score by Ben Model.)  

 

 

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Wilmington

awesome stuff. OK I would like to contribute as well by sharing this awesome link, that personally helped me get some amazing and easy to modify. check it out at scarab13.com. All custom premade files, many of them totally free to get. Also, check out Dow on: Wilmington on DVDs: How to Train Your Dragon, Treasure of the Sierra Madre, The Darjeeling Limited, The Films of Nikita Mikhalkov, The Hangover, The Human Centipede and more ...

cool post. OK I would like to contribute too by sharing this awesome link, that personally helped me get some amazing and easy to customize. check it out at scarab13.com. All custom templates, many of them dirt cheap or free to get. Also, check out Downlo on: Wilmington on Movies: I'm Still Here, Soul Kitchen and Bran Nue Dae

awesome post. Now I would like to contribute too by sharing this awesome link, that personally helped me get some beautiful and easy to modify. take a look at scarab13.com. All custom premade files, many of them free to get. Also, check out DownloadSoho.c on: MW on Movies: The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest, Paranormal Activity 2, and CIFF Wrap-Up

Carrie Mulligan on: Wilmington on DVDs: The Great Gatsby

isa50 on: Wilmington on DVDs: Gladiator; Hell's Half Acre; The Incredible Burt Wonderstone

Rory on: Wilmington on Movies: Snow White and the Huntsman

Andrew Coyle on: Wilmington On Movies: Paterson

tamzap on: Wilmington on DVDs: The Magnificent Seven, Date Night, Little Women, Chicago and more …

rdecker5 on: Wilmington on DVDs: Ivan's Childhood

Ray Pride on: Wilmington on Movies: The Purge: Election Year

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon