By Ray Pride Pride@moviecitynews.com

KINO LORBER RELEASES EARLY KUBRICK FEAR AND DESIRE ON BLU-RAY AND DVD

>KIno Lorber HULU

Fear and Desire - Blu-Ray Cover  

New York, NY – August 6, 2012 – Kino Lorber Inc. announces the release of Stanley Kubrick’s rarely-seen first feature film, FEAR AND DESIRE, newly restored by the Library of Congress.

The event marks a major milestone for Kubrick aficionados as, in the years since its original release in 1953, FEAR AND DESIRE has rarely screened to the public, and has never been given a proper video release in any format.

This film has been restored at the Library of Congress Packard Campus for Audio Visual Conservation in Culpeper, Virginia, and will debut on Blu-ray and DVD on October 23, 2012.

 

Fear and Desire #2
 Shown from left: Virginia Leith, Frank Silvera.

“It’s both the mission and privilege of the Packard Campus to preserve the breadth and depth of America’s film, video, and sound recording heritage,” said Mike Mashon, Head of the Library of Congress Moving Image Section. “Yet preservation is only a means towards making these treasures more accessible. We’re pleased that FEAR AND DESIRE can now been seen but also well protected for generations to come.”

“Kino Lorber is immensely grateful to the talented team at the Library of Congress for brilliantly restoring such a key work in the history of American cinema,” said Kino Lorber CEO Richard Lorber.

“We’re honored to participate in the process of making sure this seminal film of a 24-year-old Stanley Kubrick will now be widely available-an inspiration for film students and a thrill for film lovers everywhere.”

ABOUT THE FILM

An existential war film that is often compared with Kubrick’s PATHS OF GLORY (1957)-among three Kubrick films selected for the Library’s National Film Registry-and FULL METAL JACKET (1987), FEAR AND DESIRE follows a squad of soldiers who have crash-landed behind enemy lines and must work their way downriver to rejoin their unit.

In the process, they encounter a peasant girl (Virginia Leith) and tie her to a tree, where she is tormented by a mentally unbalanced soldier (future director Paul Mazursky).  Before making their escape, the soldiers determine the location of an enemy base and formulate a plot to assassinate its commanding officer.

Fear and Desire #1Independently financed, and shot by a skeleton crew – with Kubrick controlling almost every aspect of production –FEAR AND DESIRE was conceived as a European-style art film, cloaked in the guise of a Hollywood war picture.  Kubrick described the film to distributor Joseph Burstyn as allegorical and poetic. “A drama of ‘man,’ lost in a hostile world-deprived of material and spiritual foundations-seeking his way to an understanding of himself, and of life around him.”

Burstyn acquired the film for distribution, and released it along with such art house fare as Roberto Rossellini’s THE MIRACLE, Morris Engel’s LITTLE FUGITIVE, and Luis Bunuel’s EL BRUTO.

While it did receive some favorable notices, Kubrick’s film was often dismissed as being too pretentious, and quickly disappeared from the screen. In 1971, Kubrick told writer Alexander Walker, “The ideas we wanted to put across were good… but we didn’t have the experience to embody them dramatically.”

“It was very important to have this experience and to see with what little facilities and personnel one could actually make a film,” Kubrick said, “This experience and the one that followed with KILLER’S KISS, which was on a slightly more cushy basis, freed me from any concern again about the technical or logistical aspects of filmmaking.”

Fear and Desire #3
Shown: Paul Mazursky

Though Kubrick has dismissed the film as “a bumbling amateur film exercise,” the film has had its champions, even from its initial release. Variety called FEAR AND DESIRE, “a literate, unhackneyed war drama, outstanding for its fresh camera treatment and poetic dialogue.” Author and critic James Agee reportedly took Kubrick out for a drink to offer encouragement to the young filmmaker.

 

“The need for encouragement of fresh talent and its fairly common concomitant, the audacity of youth, was never made more pointed than in FEAR AND DESIRE, the drama fashioned by a tiny group of young, independent film makers,” wrote A.H. Weiler in The New York Times in 1953, “For, in essaying a dissection of the minds of men under the stress of war, Stanley Kubrick, 24-year-old, producer-director-photographer, and his equally young and unheralded scenarist and cast, have succeeded in turning out a moody, often visually powerful study of subdued excitements.”

It is remarkable that FEAR AND DESIRE exists today, in any form. As Kubrick found his voice as a filmmaker, he grew more self-conscious about his early work, and preferred that it remain buried in the past.  On those rare occasions when a print would surface, Kubrick took measures to halt—or at least limit—public screenings of the film.

Thanks to the preservation efforts of the Library of Congress, Kino Lorber, Inc. can share with the world FEAR AND DESIRE, fresh from the 24-year-old mind of the man who would become the most influential filmmaker of his generation

About Kino Lorber:
With a library of 700 titles, Kino Lorber Inc. has been a leader in independent distribution for over 30 years, releasing over 20 films per year theatrically under its Kino Lorber, Kino Classics, Redemption Films, Horizon Movies and Alive Mind Cinema banners.

In addition, the Company brings over 60 titles each year to the home entertainment market with DVD and Blu-ray releases as well as digital distribution.

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon