By Ray Pride Pride@moviecitynews.com

ON AUGUST 10 & 11 LARRY MCMURTRY TO AUCTION 300,000 BOOKS AS PART OF “THE LAST BOOK SALE”

Archer City, TX – August 8, 2012 – Academy Award winning screenwriter and acclaimed author Larry McMurtry has announced the sale of over 300,000 books as part of an auction entitled “The Last Book Sale,” taking place on August 10 and 11, 2012.  Addison & Sarova Auctioneers will oversee the event, which will be held at McMurtry’s BOOKED UP, INC. store in Archer City, TX.  The collection is one of the largest in America and is housed in three of the four buildings comprising Booked Up. McMurtry is not closing his bookstore and will continue to sell books after the auction out of the main Booked Up building, which contains over 165,000 titles.

McMurtry’s entire store encompasses over 450,000 books, with a large selection of antiquarian titles as well as fine quality general stock.  The auction will include all books currently housed in buildings two through four as part of a shelf sale, as well as 100 books personally chosen by McMurtry to be sold as individual lots.  He says that while they may not be the most expensive books, they are titles he finds interesting. The plan is for each shelf to contain several valuable books as well as good general stock.  There will be a weeklong preview beginning August 3 through 9.  McMurtry will be on hand for the event.

The auction is a “can’t miss” for those interested in fine quality general books as well as collectors of rare books and manuscripts.  McMurtry has been buying and selling books for the past forty years, including the purchases of hundreds of private collections as well as complete inventory from over 25 stores.  He hopes to inspire the next generation of book lovers to start their own stores and said, “Young dealers have a chance to acquire some good stock.”

The store is just one building away from where “The Last Picture Show” was filmed, and the event should bring a large audience of book lovers and the literary world to Archer City. His personal collection of 28,000 books acquired over the past 55 years, specializing in general humanities and reference titles, currently resides at his home in Archer City.

 # # #

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon