By Ray Pride Pride@moviecitynews.com

SUNDANCE SELECTS TAKES U.S. THEATRICAL RIGHTS TO KEN BURNS, SARAH BURNS AND DAVID MCMAHON’S THE CENTRAL PARK FIVE

Posted Monday, August 6th, 2012 - Comments Off on SUNDANCE SELECTS TAKES U.S. THEATRICAL RIGHTS TO KEN BURNS, SARAH BURNS AND DAVID MCMAHON’S THE CENTRAL PARK FIVE
Be Sociable, Share!

New York, NY (August 6, 2012) – Sundance Selects announced today that the company is acquiring U.S. theatrical rights to acclaimed documentary THE CENTRAL PARK FIVE. Ken Burns co-directed, wrote and produced the project with his daughter, Sarah Burns (author of the book “The Central Park Five: A Chronicle of a City Wilding”) and her husband, David McMahon. The documentary, which is Ken Burns’ first theatrical release since HUEY LONG in 1985, was recently announced as part of the 2012 Toronto International Film Festival’s documentary lineup and as the Closing Night film of the third annual DOC NYC festival in November. THE CENTRAL PARK FIVE made its world premiere earlier this year as an official selection at the 2012 Cannes Film Festival.

In 1989, five black and Latino teenagers from Harlem were arrested and later convicted of brutally beating and raping a white woman in New York City’s Central Park. New York Mayor Ed Koch called it the “crime of the century” and it remains to date one of the biggest media stories of our time. The five eachspent between 6 and 13 years in prison before a shocking confession from a serial rapist and DNA evidence proved their innocence. Set against a backdrop of a decaying city beset by violence and racial tension, THE CENTRAL PARK FIVE tells the story of how five lives were upended by the rush to judgment by police, a sensationalist media and a devastating miscarriage of justice.

Jonathan Sehring, President of Sundance Selects/IFC Films said: “It’s incredibly rare to see Ken Burns’ name associated with a theatrical documentary but working with Sarah Burns and David McMahon, he has made an exceptional one. We’re honored to be working with the filmmakers on this thoughtful andtimely film that exposes a huge miscarriage of justice.”

“This story again exposes the deep fault line of race that runs through our American experience,” commented Burns. “It was all too easy for people to see these five teenagers as violent criminals simply because of the color of their skin. We are so thrilled to be partnering with Sundance Selects/IFC Films to bring light to the untold story of the Central Park Five.”

The deal for THE CENTRAL PARK FIVE was negotiated by Jeff Deutchman, Director of Acquisitions & Productions for Sundance Selects/IFC Films, with co-director-writer-producer McMahon on behalf of the filmmakers.

IFC Films and Sundance Selects are sister labels, owned and operated by AMC Networks Inc.

###

About SUNDANCE SELECTS

Established in 2009 and based in New York City, Sundance Selects is a leading U.S. distributor of prestige films focusing on American independents, documentaries and world cinema. In 2011, the label distributed the year’s 3 highest independently released documentaries including Werner Herzog’s CAVE OF FORGOTTEN DREAMS (also the highest grossing film of his career), Cindy Meehl’s BUCK and Wim Wenders’ Academy Award nominated PINA.  The company also released the Dardenne brothers’ THE KID WITH A BIKE which won the Grand Prix at Cannes and Abbas Kiarostami’s CERTIFIED COPY for which Juliette Binoche won the Best Actress at Cannes. Upcoming releases include:  David France’s HOW TO SURVIVE A PLAGUE, Adam Leon’s SXSW winner GIMME THE LOOT, Julia Loktev’s AFI winner THE LONELIEST PLANET, Cristian Mungiu’s double Cannes prize winner BEYOND THE HILLS; Olivier Assayas’ SOMETHING IN THE AIR and Walter Salles’ Cannes competition film ON THE ROAD starring Kristen Stewart, Sam Riley and Garrett Hedlund (which will be released jointly with IFC Films.)  Sundance Selects is a sister label to IFC Films and IFC Midnight, and is owned and operated by AMC Networks Inc.

#  #  #

 

Be Sociable, Share!

Posted in Movie City News, Press Releases | Comments Off on SUNDANCE SELECTS TAKES U.S. THEATRICAL RIGHTS TO KEN BURNS, SARAH BURNS AND DAVID MCMAHON’S THE CENTRAL PARK FIVE

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon