By Ray Pride

SIFF Receives Major Grant From The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences


3-Year Commitment to Showcase African Films at Seattle International Film Festival

Seattle, WA, November 20, 2012 – SIFF is excited to announce that it is the 2012 recipient of The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences multiyear grant for its “African Pictures” program to be presented during the annual Seattle International Film Festival. SIFF will receive a total of $150,000 over a three-year period to showcase the diverse and burgeoning hotbed of filmmaking activity emerging across the continent of Africa.  This grant will give SIFF an unprecedented opportunity as a major international film festival to showcase a substantive program of indigenous films from Africa.

“Thanks to the Academy’s significant support of our “African Pictures program”, says SIFF Artistic Director Carl Spence,”  SIFF will be able to dig deep across the African continent and greatly expand on our previous efforts in the region that we have been working on for several years.” Past African films that have received their North American Premiere at the Seattle International Film Festival include: TEY (Senegal, 2012); OTELO BURNING (South Africa, 2011) and SPUD (South Africa, 2010); and IMANI (Uganda, 2009). Starting at SIFF 2013 (May 16 – June 09, 2013), a minimum of ten African feature films a year will be presented at the Seattle International Film Festival throughout the course of the three-year program.

SIFF Programmer Dustin Kaspar is currently travelling in Africa, attending the Durban International Film Festival (July 2012), Cairo International Film Festival (December 2012) and FESPACO (Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, February 2013). His presence in Africa and at these film festivals will afford an opportunity to build industry relationships and deepen SIFF’s programming while also facilitating a greater awareness of the treasures of contemporary African cinema to a broader audience in the United States.

Visiting African filmmakers will be invited to attend and engage with other filmmaking delegates from around the world and interact with audiences following their film screenings.  SIFF will also provide complimentary tickets to educators and their students to participate and attend screenings at the Festival in addition to taking filmmakers into classrooms around the region as part of SIFF’s FutureWave education outreach program for K-12 and University students.

Seattle is a multicultural city with inhabitants from hundreds of cities throughout the globe. With a diverse immigrant population from countries such as Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia, Sudan, and neighboring countries who are living in the Greater Seattle area, comes an increased need to not only understand, but also appreciate, the cultures that influence the city. “African Pictures” will benefit festival-goers directly as well as provide a deeper understanding of indigenous issues and of important sociopolitical concerns on the African continent.  The ambition and scope of “African Pictures” promotes cultural discourse through the medium of film and perfectly matches with SIFF’s mission to create experiences that bring people together to discover extraordinary films from around the world. It is through the art of cinema that we foster a community that is more informed, aware, and alive


Founded in 1976, SIFF creates experiences that bring people together to discover extraordinary films from around the world with the Seattle International Film Festival, SIFF Cinema and SIFF Education.

Recognized as one of the top film festivals in North America, the Seattle International Film Festival is the largest, most highly-attended film festival in the United States reaching more than 150,000 annually. The 25-day festival is renowned for its wide-ranging and eclectic programming presenting over 250 features and 150 short films from over 70 countries each year.

SIFF Cinema exhibits premiere theatrical engagements, repertory, classic, and revival film showings 365 days a year on four screens at the SIFF Film Center and the historic SIFF Cinema Uptown, reaching more than 100,000 attendees annually.

SIFF Education offers educational programs for all audiences serving more than 11,000 students and youth in the community with free programs each year.

Learn more at

#   #   #


Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon