By Ray Pride Pride@moviecitynews.com

NEW NOVEL RE-TELLS PRIDE AND PREJUDICE FROM SERVANTS’ PERSPECTIVE

Posted Thursday, February 7th, 2013 - Comments Off on NEW NOVEL RE-TELLS PRIDE AND PREJUDICE FROM SERVANTS’ PERSPECTIVE
Be Sociable, Share!

Film Rights Acquired by Random House Studio and Focus Features

Transworld, Knopf, and Random House Canada to Publish Jo Baker’s LONGBOURN This Fall;

A British writer with a passion for Jane Austen has written a new novel based on Pride and Prejudice – but told from the point of view of the servants at the Bennet family estate. The novel, LONGBOURN by Jo Baker, was acquired in a series of pre-empts and will be published this fall by Transworld in the UK; Alfred A. Knopf in the U.S.; and Random House in Canada. Film rights were snapped up by Random House Studio and Focus Features, and translation rights have already been sold in Spain, Italy, Norway, Denmark, Germany, Brazil, France, and Sweden.

LONGBOURN will reveal what Jane Austen did not: the constant chaos swirling downstairs, the preparation for lavish balls, the housekeeper’s real thoughts about the family patriarch. But it will also reveal the tragic consequences of the Napoleonic Wars and focus on a romance between a newly arrived footman and a housemaid, the novel’s main characters.

“Jane Austen was my first experience of grown-up literature,” Baker said. “But as I read and re-read her books, I began to become aware that if I’d been living at the time, I wouldn’t have got to go to the ball; I would have been stuck at home with the sewing. Just a few generations back, my family were in service. Aware of that English class thing, Pride and Prejudice begins to read a little differently.”

Marianne Velmans, who acquired British and Commonwealth rights to LONGBOURN, described the pitch – “Pride and Prejudice from the servants’ point of view” – as irresistible. “I raced through the novel in one sitting,” she said. “I found Baker had written a beautiful, stylish, moving and totally compelling book which, while faithful to Austen, presents a completely original love story against the harsh backdrop of working people’s lives in Regency England.”

“It’s a stunning achievement,” says Diana Coglianese, who will edit the book for Knopf. “While LONGBOURN brings to life a different side of the world Austen first created, I was impressed even more by the way this novel stands as a transporting, fully realized work of fiction in its own right.”

“Jo Baker has lovingly written a gorgeous novel that opens up a whole new world,” says Canadian Publisher Louise Dennys. “She brings alive the intimate, often hard ‘downstairs’ life that underpins the genteel world of the Bennets.  Baker’s clear-eyed perspective on the five Bennet girls and Mr. and Mrs. Bennet, on the affairs going on behind the scenes, and on the Napoleonic Wars that bring the military to town, will entrance readers everywhere. “

Focus Features CEO James Schamus said, “Jo Baker fully inhabits the lives of her characters – and in LONGBOURN, they are ones who previously existed in the background only. By compellingly exploring new avenues in the world of Pride and Prejudice she has fashioned a tale of a caliber that filmmakers dream about. We are delighted to be partnering again with our friends and colleagues at Random House Studio to co-finance and produce what will be a highly anticipated motion picture for audiences worldwide.”

Random House Studio President Peter Gethers said, “This is one of the most exciting projects that has come along since we began our partnership with Focus.  It’s rare to see a wonderful novel that screams out to us – in a genteel, Austen-like way, of course – that it needs to be made into an equally wonderful film. We were thrilled to be able to move so quickly and delighted to partner with various Random House companies here and around the world as we bring LONGBOURN to the screen.”

Jo Baker was born in Lancashire and educated at Oxford University and Queen’s University Belfast. Her previous novels include Offcomer, The Mermaid’s Child, The Telling, and The Undertow (in the UK this book was titled The Picture Book). She lives in Lancaster.

The author is represented by Clare Alexander; U.S. rights were handled by Anna Stein and film rights by Lesley Thorne, all of Aitken Alexander Associates.

Be Sociable, Share!

Posted in Movie City News, Press Releases | Comments Off on NEW NOVEL RE-TELLS PRIDE AND PREJUDICE FROM SERVANTS’ PERSPECTIVE

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon