By Jake Howell jake.howell@utoronto.ca

Cannes Competition Review: Heli

Better known as a protégé of Carlos Reygadas, Amat Escalante (Los Bastardos)’s Heli runs a gamut of topics sure to make an audience gasp: from sexual travesties to animal cruelty to unflinching torture, the content here makes for a tough sit. But it’s also an important film, as Escalante turns the camera on his hometown of Guadajuato to grapple with some  of Mexico’s biggest problems: cartel and drug-related violence.

The Spanish-born director wastes no time in setting the tone for Heli’s horrors, which are graphically depicted. With a car-mounted camera, the film’s exquisite opening tracking shot foreshadows events to come when a truck full of thugs hang a corpse from a neighborhood bridge, a shocking image of gore and fear. Unfortunately, we know the tableau is drawn directly from reality, as any related Google searches will provide photographic evidence of Mexican criminals’ rampant barbarities. Nevertheless, other tracking shots throughout the film continue to impress, and Escalante’s throwback to The Searchers’ bookend scenes is a welcome one.

Before the violence realizes its fullest gut-wrenching potential, we’re introduced to a small working-class family and the eponymous Heli, who lives in the same casa with his father, his wife, his baby, and his younger sister Estela (each played by local actors; Armando Espitia’s turn as the title character an especially strong one). Heli and his father work diligently at a local factory—underlined, to be sure, as honorable work in a land of corruption—while his wife stays home to take care of their infant. Things are generally más o menos around the house until Beto, Estela’s cadet boyfriend, finds a cache of cocaine in an underground deposit. Heli intercepts and destroys the packages, but once the damage is traced back to him, cartel crooks storm his house and attack his family.

A difficult narrative, but given the reality of it all, the result comes across as nonfiction and the antithesis of contrived. The production values are also surprisingly high for this low-budget drama, with Escalante achieving absolute fidelity where Heli needs it most: the lighting is natural and faithful (the roads are unlit and the nights are pitch-black, reminiscent of Nuri Bilge Ceylan’s 2011 Once Upon a Time in Anatolia) and the violence is stark and terrifying. Hammering home the latter point is one of the most brutal torture scenes in recent memory, which manages to convey the unshakeable feeling of true helplessness. To that end, it should be clear: if you thought Zero Dark Thirty was painful to watch, Escalante has four words for you: “crotch” and “fire” and “unflinching camera.” Taken together, the result is a rattling experience–but a fine film in its own regard.

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon