By Jake Howell jake.howell@utoronto.ca

Countdown to Cannes: Alexander Payne

ALEXANDER PAYNE

Background: American; born Omaha, Nebraska, 1961.

Alexander Payne © Ray Pride

Known for / styles: Election (1999), About Schmidt (2002), Sideways (2004), The Descendants (2011); shooting and setting narratives in Omaha; adultery narratives and satirical, dark humor; films that revolve around a lonely protagonist.

Notable accolades: The majority of Payne’s awards are for his adapted screenplays. At the top of the list, Payne is the recipient of two Academy Awards for Best Adapted Screenplay (The Descendants, based on the Kaui Hart Hemmings novel of the same name; Sideways, adapted from the Rex Pickett novel of the same name), with a BAFTA equivalent in 2004 for good measure (Sideways). In lieu of a Best Picture Oscar, The Descendants was AFI’s Movie of the Year in 2011.

Previous Cannes appearances: Payne has played in Competition only once (2002’s About Schmidt), but the Festival has enjoyed his company in other ways: in 2005, he was the President of the Un Certain Regard jury, while in 2006, Payne participated in anthology film Paris, je t’aime (Un Certain Regard). Last year, Payne sat on Nanni Moretti’s Competition jury.

Film he’s bringing to Cannes: Nebraska, a black-and-white dramedy starring Bruce Dern and Will Forte on a father-son road trip. When Woody (Dern) thinks he’s won a lucrative Publisher’s Clearing House prize, he travels to Nebraska with his son David (Forte) to claim the prize. Bob Odenkirk shows up for a supporting role.

Could it win the Palme? Payne was in the running for a Best Picture Oscar at the 84th Academy Awards with The Descendants, but lost to The Artist, which coincidentally premiered at Cannes. But that’s okay, as Payne can rest assured in knowing the jury has likely seen the majority of his filmography, as it is both beloved and well-known. (And hey, with Reese Witherspoon’s recent arrest making news, I can’t be the only one with plans to re-watch Election). All things considered, Payne has very strong odds: Nebraska sees him returning to his home state to shoot, and it seems unwise to bet against a world-class director working where he feels most comfortable, given how culturally significant Election and About Schmidt have become (both films were set in Omaha).

Why you should care: With Nebraska, Alexander Payne is both staying safe and branching out: shooting in his home state should mean the story is steeped in personal authority, but the director’s decision to film in black-and-white is a new look for Payne. If his second shot at a Palme d’Or doesn’t pan out, though, expect him (and Nebraska) to be a heavily-tipped awards contender come December, like every one of his films since Election.

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon