By Leonard Klady Klady@moviecitynews.com

Leonard Klady Remembers Dan Ireland

The news of Dan Ireland’s death is about as tough as it gets.

My friendship with him goes back a long time, to the days when he ran the Seattle Film Festival with Darryl Macdonald. He was the dynamo of the duo. Dan would bounce off the wall with ideas, and that was part of the reason the event was so much fun. He had a keen appreciation that he was putting on a show, as well as introducing audiences to new ideas in cinema.

His and Darryl’s ferocity at finding new talent was legendary. It was a time when film festivals played a significant role in getting unknown filmmakers in the door.

It was a surprise when I learned that he was leaving Seattle back in the mid-1980s to become a production executive at Vestron, home of Dirty Dancing and a lot of cheesy movies that have faded.

We had lunch in Los Angeles shortly after he arrived. We talked shop and I gave him cautionary notes on what this evil town might have in store for him. He probably didn’t have a keen sense of what he was getting into, but that didn’t matter because whatever roadblocks lay ahead were no match for his unbridled enthusiasm.

As a movie exec he would go on to champion new talents as well as such old lions as Ken Russell and John Huston. My wife got to know him as a suit when she worked for Huston on The Dead. I wasn’t surprised when she told me that Dan was attentive, supportive, accommodating and all those things you want from head office and rarely receive. And on top of those things he was smart and funny.

A decade later he decided he wanted to be a film director. The first film was The Whole Wide World (1996), a view askew of writer Robert Howard and his relationship with a young schoolteacher in a dustbowl Texas town in the 1930s. If you knew Dan, you had to wonder what in the whole wide world does he know about Depression era Texas … even if his characters were eccentrics.

I saw the film at Sundance and couldn’t have been more delighted. It was a stunning debut and we got together the following day. He brought along Vince D’Onofrio but his female find Renee Zellweger couldn’t attend because of a work conflict. Regardless it was a charged meal, as my enthusiasm for what he’d achieved came close to his passion for this new act in his life. There was no doubt that he’d meticulously thought out every aspect of production and sought out all the talent he’d nurtured over the years to give him advice, assistance and adrenalin.

In addition to Ms. Zellweger there were other significant young actors that owe him a big debt for advancing their careers, not limited to Jessica Chastain and Emmy Rossum. The handful of features he made were always first class, although commercially they fell in the category of success d’estime. It’s disappointing that someone with some clout didn’t have Dan Ireland’s sense of talent and offer him the sort of film that would have pushed him to the next level.

There were a couple of projects he had in the works that sounded promising in the past year that evaporated. I was excited and I’m sure he was pushing ahead with his usual vigor. I’d wanted him to do my radio show on the BBC, but never heard back from him.

It goes without saying he was far too young to leave this mortal coil. The obituaries didn’t give a cause of death but he had to be gravely ill. There’s no other explanation that makes sense; his boundless energy and upbeat attitude ought to have been sufficient to overcome whatever trivial bumps he encountered along the path of life.

Dan Ireland’s death leaves a gaping hole in my life that won’t be filled. He touched a lot of people in the course of his life and work and tears simply do not suffice for his absence.

 

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon