By Jake Howell jake.howell@utoronto.ca

Countdown To Cannes: Andrey Zvyagintsev

Leviathan aThe thirteenth in a series of snapshots outlining the nineteen directors in the 67th Palme d’Or Competition.

Background: Russian; born Novosibirsk, Siberia 1964.

ZvyagintsevKnown for / style: The Return (2003), The Banishment (2007), Elena (2011); working with cinematographer Mikhail Krichman, actors Konstantin Lavronenko and Elena Lyadova, and screenwriter Oleg Negin; smaller productions with minimal characters; dazzling on-location images; water motifs; films that dissect social issues of the Russian working class; narratives of family and domestic drama.

Notable accolades: Zvyagintsev (approximately pronounced zvah-geent-sev)’s first film The Return sparked a major rash of awards, but none as big as the Venice’s Golden Lion (also at Venice: the Luigi de Laurentiis Award, SIGNIS award, Sergio Trasatti Award, and the CinemAvvenire award). Heralded by the European Film Awards as “Discovery of the Year” in 2003, the director went on to pick up a Jury Prize at Cannes for his Un Certain Regard film Elena (2011), with many critics claiming it should have played in Competition. He’s won three FIPRESCI prizes, snagged a “high commendation” for directing at the Asia Pacific Screen Awards, and secured even more prizes at local and smaller European festivals.

Previous Cannes appearances: In 2007, Zyvagintsev moved on from the Lido and debuted Competition title The Banishment on the Croisette, where it was received with mixed reviews. Perhaps as a result, Cannes slotted his follow-up Elena into Un Certain Regard. 2014 will mark his second film in Competition.

Leviathan BFilm he’s bringing to Cannes: Leviathan, a Russian-language drama. From IMDb: “Spanning multiple characters about the human insecurity in a “new country,” [Leviathan] gradually unwinds to a mythological scale concerning the human condition on earth entirely.” According to Leviathan producer Alexander Rodnyansky, the film is “a story of love and tragedy experienced by ordinary people.” Rejoining Zvyagintsev for his fourth feature are scriptwriter Olen Negin, cinematographer Mikhail Krichman, actress Elena Lyadova, and Elena sound designer Andrey Dergachev. The film is a contemporary spin on the Book of Job, meaning Zvyagintsev’s typically small cast size has been ramped up considerably to tell a larger story.

Could it win the Palme? Leviathan is sure to be a major front-runner, despite screening on the very last day of the Festival (something Zvyagintsev should be used to, with Elena closing Un Certain Regard in 2011). Given the scope and intention of the production, there is a possibility the film grew too large (this is the director’s biggest budget to date), but nevertheless this is a keenly anticipated Competition title; one that is tipped to be an awards giant.

Why you should care: Called a “sophomore slump” by some, The Banishment is the director’s least successful film as far as critics were concerned; outside of that, Zvyagintsev’s first and third features are compared to work by Russian film heroes like Tarkovsky. It’s also the only Russian film in Competition, and given how many films are made there locally per year, you can bet this hand-picked title is likely very strong.

Follow Jake Howell on Twitter: @Jake_Howell

Previous Entries:

Tommy Lee Jones

Atom Egoyan

Bennett Miller

Xavier Dolan

David Cronenberg

Nuri Bilge Ceylan

Naomi Kawase

Ken Loach

Michel Hazanavicius

Jean-Luc Godard

Bertrand Bonello

Jean-Pierre and Luc Dardenne

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon