MCN Curated Headlines Archive for May, 2017

hollywoodreporter.com

“Rupert Murdoch had been advised that a condolence call to Ailes’ wife would not be well received.”
No Murdochs At Roger Ailes Funeral, Michael Wolff Tells

“The perils of writing while female: We called his film sexist. He tried to destroy our credibility.”
The Seventh Row Not Taking Any Of Angry, Abusive Male Director’s Shit

“I can never claim to be in a position where I’m having to make decisions with life and death consequences. But I do need to be able to wrangle a gigantic machine.”
David Michôd On “War Machine” And Netflix

hollywoodreporter.com

“I plan to return to the job that I love, which is television, communicating, interviewing people. I have changed in a way that I think will make me better at my job. I believe there will be more people like me in crisis.One thing I learned at The Hoffman Process is that I’ve always relied on my charm and my quick wit and all that, but I’ve kept my depth in the shadows.”
Billy Bush Still Wants The Limelight, Deliriously Softball THR Cover Story Proclaims

hollywoodreporter.com

“As a longtime Fandor subscriber, I developed a special appreciation for their distinctive programming and recommendation engine. Specifically, the ‘human element’ that sets Fandor apart from so many other services in this space, most of which are purely algorithmic. With my involvement in the broadcasting and social platform business for over five years with my company, VyRT, I’m very much looking forward to this collaboration and know I can bring a unique perspective.”
Jared Leto Assumes Creative Reins Of Fandor Film Streaming Service

“Television, that talking furniture we look to as a cure for loneliness, is not expected to surprise. The odd is downright thrilling. Not to embrace it is to perceive yourself as finished, dead to the New, terminal in the enthusiasms.”
John Leonard‘s Memorable May 7, 1990 NYMag Take On “Twin Peaks”

“We all need to find perspective. We have to keep breathing — in and out — and keep working, keep putting it out there. I mean, what’s the alternative — that we just go under the duvet and don’t come out? It’s befuddling, but it’s life, and it’s evolution rolling on.”
Tilda Swinton Comes Up For Air

“Your instincts are sometimes better than your intellect. Intellectualizing, or pseudo-intellectualizing, can get you in a real box. Film is an emotional art form, not an intellectual art form at all.”
Clint Master-Classes Cannes with vid, audio

“Obfuscation is a balm.”
Kim Morgan On Inherent Vice

“I really think we’re in a media circus. If you’re a politician, people have to know you exist — for that to happen you need to have controversy.”
Ruben Östlund On The Square

LA Times

“I was naive enough to think that if you exhibit competence in something, the movie makes some money and people are happy, that you move onto something of equal size — or larger. No jobs came to me. Zero. Lost, in every case, to a man.”
Robin Swicord On Not Getting A Second Directing Gig For Ten Years

telegraph.co.uk

“But theaters don’t want to book movies that are day-and-date. It’s meant to sustain an unsustainable advantage of exclusivity for access to films when most people cannot go and buy a ticket and see that movie. Remember, we’re living in an age where everything is at our fingertips, and there are very few things in the world that you still have to do at a certain time and place. I know why I have to be at the airport at 8:00 to be on my flight, but I don’t know why I have to be at the theatre at 8:00 to see the start of my movie.”
Guess The Chief Content Officer

“In many cases they don’t seem to have bought their books from publishers. No one is quite sure where their books come from, including, it seems, Amazon itself.”
Amazon Changes The Way It Labels Books So That You Can’t Tell If Authors Are Publishers Are Getting A Penny

“The thing I was up against in documentary films—and mine were both primarily character studies—was trying to get non-actors to convincingly play themselves in a way I’d come to know before the camera started rolling. And many non-actors can’t do that convincingly, even if they just have to play themselves—they can’t be naturalistic.”
Julia Yepes Gets The Best From Terry Zwigoff

NY Times

“We’re living amid a generation that has seen every great movie ever made on a phone, so I think we all have to come to grips with where technology takes us. Why would we want to hold back a movie for an enormous number of people to enjoy throughout the entire country that a few hundred, maybe a few thousand people could see the film in Paris? It seemed to me like the right thing to do was to give the people, our subscribers, who pay to make these movies, access to them immediately all over the world.”
Netflix Sarandos Roundtables Journos On Côte d’Azur; Expresses Intent To Debut “Other Side Of The Wind” At Cannes 2018

“Great rom-coms are about something. Sleepless in Seattle is really about grieving and moving on. And When Harry Met Sally is just a great account of two people and their relationship growing over a decade. It’s become a denigrated genre. In the 2000s, they were really churning them out so hard that the quality dropped. It’s like what happened with fantasy films. Studio execs were like, “Lord of the Rings! People want to see sword-and-dragon-type things!” No, people just want to see great stories. Hollywood always takes the wrong lesson from successes.”
Kumail Nanjiani On The Funny

MCN Curated Headlines

“I don’t think it’s cruel to say this, because John himself would undoubtedly have turned it into a gleeful anecdote: When he had the stroke that killed him, he was at a local dinner theater. Hell of a review.”

“I am inclined to aver that every activity needs its critics, from narcissists bloviating in Washington to exhibitors of knee holes in their blue jeans by way of following a fad. So, too, tennis players and others wearing their caps backward. There is, to be sure, only fairly innocuous folly in puncturing pants or reversing caps, but for political or artistic or religious twisting of thought or harboring holes in the head there is rather less excuse. I have always inveighed against the bleary journalism practiced by newspaper reviewers, as opposed to the real criticism performed by, well, critics.”

“I often felt a twinge of grief at the idea that John Simon had devoted his life to a method of work that could only make him increasingly unhappy. Here was a man, elegant, articulate, and vastly knowledgeable, fluent in at least half a dozen languages, whose gifts of mind gave nothing back to the arts he wrote about except a few unkind remarks that made fun of someone’s performance, ethnicity, physical attributes, or, with a pun, on his target’s name. (“If this is Norman Wisdom, I’ll take Saxon folly.”) Other theatre critics keep such darts in their rucksacks for occasional use; John lived by them.”

“One person’s critic is another person’s crackpot. That they are not united in their opinions is ascribable to the Latin saying: quot homines, tot sententiae. I myself prefer being considered a creep, but that is what you get for having what Vladimir Nabokov called ‘Strong Opinions.’ It is odd that in a country so wallowing in negativity, starting with mass shootings and climaxing with Trump, such an unimportant matter as theater criticism should generate so much hostility. The only target patently more important is lead in the drinking water.”

The DVD Wrapup: Cold War, Betty Blue, Official Secrets, Demons, Olivia, American Dreamer, Land of Yik Yak

E. Scott Weinberg On Youthful Fangoria Encounters

Rome Bookstore Closes

With a Grauniad-Alleged $300 Million Budget, Could The Yet-Unseen But Surely Weird Cats Pass A Billion Dollars at The Box Office?

WEEKEND READS ON MEDIAQUAKE

Tribune Trolley Problem

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon