Old MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

From NYC to Sundance: James Ponsoldt and Scott Macaulay, 'Off the Black'


[This article is part of an ongoing series profiling New York films and filmmakers at the 2006 Sundance Film Festival. Click here for other features in the series.]
Off the Black was almost done. Almost. What its veteran producer Scott Macaulay sort of shruggingly referred to it as a “photo finish,” its writer-director James Ponsoldt laughed off a little more nervously.
“I think we were probably in the last batch of films to submit to Sundance,” Ponsoldt said last weekend. “We shot really late. So we were doing the sound mix this past week at Sound One, and we finished that late Friday, and we’re doing our Dolby imprint Monday. We saw our first answer print Friday, and then we’re going to have the second print Tuesday or Wednesday. We’re doing titles as we speak; I think those are probably going to be done Tuesday. And our first screening is Friday.”
And then there were all “the weird things about emulsion.” Nevertheless, the irrepresible Ponsoldt–a first-time feature director whose shorts have screened in dozens of festivals around the world–was virtually counting down the days to Off the Black‘s Eccles Theatre premiere. And why not? The Brooklyn resident will travel to Sundance with one of the festival’s most anticipated titles, starring Nick Nolte as a lonely, washed-up high school baseball umpire who strikes up a bizarre relationship with a young pitcher (Trevor Morgan) he catches vandalizing his house.
“It was fantastic,” Ponsoldt said of working with Nolte. “Obviously, a lot of people have an idea of what Nick Nolte is like as a personality, but he’s such a sweet guy. If he has an ego, I didn’t notice it. He was kind and awesome to everybody on set, and he really committed himself to do it.”
But, dude–Nick Nolte. On your first feature. “He read it and said he wanted to meet me,” Ponsoldt said. “So I went out to L.A. to meet him. I guess he wanted just make sure I wasn’t a fucking idiot or a jerk or whatever, because once he said he would do it, from that point on, he was willing to do anything, and he was the easiest actor to work with.”
As a world premiere, Off the Black naturally travels to Sundance without a distribution deal in place. Macaulay has plenty of experience with the feeding frenzy that can result from this, but he and co-producer Robin O’Hara are not letting the extra work and pressure overwhelm them. “We’re excited about Sundance because we think it’s the perfect festival to launch this film,” he said. “And at the same time, as a producer, you sort of have to take the long view on everything.”
Ponsoldt is equally philosophical. “I had somebody once tell me that when you’re making features, there are two distinct parts,” he said. “The making of the film, and the selling of the film. And don’t corrupt the former with the latter, or you’ll probably compromise anything that’s meaningful to you. So I guess the big difference is the selling part of it.”
Not that he is preoccupying himself too much with that before the titles are even done, or with so many other movies finding their ways to his schedule–especially some of those by his film school colleagues from Columbia.
“I don’t think Sundance is the ideal place to see films you want to see, especially if you have a film there,” he said. “It’s kind of a gross mob scene. I don’t really like going to parties. But I’m going to be there for pretty much the whole festival, and what I’m resolute in doing is seeing my friends’ films. … I just want to see the films that sound wonderful.”

Be Sociable, Share!

One Response to “From NYC to Sundance: James Ponsoldt and Scott Macaulay, 'Off the Black'”

  1. jim ponsoldt says:

    i’m the director’s father. i’m not objective. i saw two rough cut screenings and then two screenings at sundance. the film is moving, funny, beautiful, and important. how do we get films like this shown at multiplexes around the country–including the small city in which i live? the entire cast was perfect–nick nolte deserves a lot of respect and recognition for his performance.
    jim ponsoldt

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon