Old MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Martin Does Page Six; World Laughs on the Inside


Now that pretty much everyone and their doormen have weighed in on the extortion controversy afflicting Page Six freelancer Jared Paul Stern, we can finally sift through the pile-up to sort the dead. For example, Gawker compromised its unofficial “Payola Six” reporting leadership by allowing Stern a weekend editing gig, which he handled about as elegantly as he stammered out his $220,000 request to Ron Burkle. And then there is Art Buchwald, whose evidently terminal unfunniness (he wrote from hospice) persisted Monday in The Washington Post with ruminations like, “In any case, I liked the story because it had nothing to do with leaks from the White House.”
But the most mangled casualty to be dragged smoldering from the cultural collision might be Steve Martin, who wrote up his own parody of Page Six for The New Yorker. Loaded with “full disclosures” and other in-“jokes,” Martin’s piece has swept the Web as some sort of piercing satire; but as much as I wanted to be amused, I found myself reading it with a waning enthusiasm not dissimilar to the ethos guiding Martin’s film career.
I mean, is this what passes for funny in The New Yorker?

Later, Late Show

David Letterman, the poor man’s Alan Thicke (full disclosure: Dave refused to match our Oscar gift basket), made a snide joke on his show about Page Six appearing not on page 6 but on page 12. Yeah, well, so? The reason that Page Six appears on page 12 is that we are getting a regular envelope under the door from the Committee to Promote the Number Twelve, and it would be too confusing to our readers to change the name of the column to Page Twelve, and, anyway, we are also receiving a tasty monthly contribution from the Society to Promote the Number Six.

Look on the bright side: At least David Denby can rest easy knowing he is, for once, not the magazine’s most insipid contributor. A thank-you card must be in order.

Be Sociable, Share!

2 Responses to “Martin Does Page Six; World Laughs on the Inside”

  1. ernie says:

    i enjoy reading the New Yorker, but have never ever found any of their alleged humor pieces to be even remotely funny.

  2. Cryptic Ned says:

    I actually thought this week’s “The Rough Guide to My Apartment” was the first funny “Shouts and Murmurs” in five or six years. Check it out at the website.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon