Old MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

'Brave One,' Part II: Jordan, Howard Wait it Out Uptown


A few hours after watching the NYPD make good on the city’s promise to tow away cars that would dare interfere with the making of Jodie Foster’s latest film, The Reeler stopped back by the set of The Brave One yesterday to check out director Neil Jordan’s progress.
A tipster on 88th Street informs me that Foster herself was not at the location, where Jordan was shooting a traffic jam sequence featuring Brave One co-star Terrence Howard. The Hustle & Flow star chatted with the script supervisor and passed out love to his stand-in while Jordan roamed the street semi-aimlessly, half-surveying his set-up and half-restlessly pacing around the prop police car. At one point he approached the B&B Marketplace at the corner of 88th and Third Avenue, a few feet from where I stood observing the scene.

Brave One director Neil Jordan hits the street (Photos: STV)

“Going OK?” I asked him.
“Kind of busy right now,” Jordan replied.
“How’s the Upper East Side treating you?”
“Hot,” he said, stalking away.
“Dude, where’s my car?” I shouted.
OK, not really. The guy was working, folks. He’s Neil Jordan. Anyway, the whole crew had packed up and disappeared by early evening, making the neighborhood safe again for vehicle owners to ignore parking regulations. And to take your clothes to the cleaners. And to get a flimsy slice at Roma Pizza. I can sense the relief from here.

Be Sociable, Share!

One Response to “'Brave One,' Part II: Jordan, Howard Wait it Out Uptown”

  1. grasshopper says:

    Hey Reeler, It’s 8:30 pm Sunday on Nassau and Beekman Sts. You know around the corner from J&R World? They’re filming the “Brave One” outside our apt. right now. Pup tent sized rhomboid cotton balloony things on strings hold big-time lights inside. They’re bobbing all over at streetlight level. But a pretty young blonde woman told us we could not go hang around Fulton St. and follow the filming from there. Still, there is plenty of action outside our windows.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon