MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Note To Last Entry…

Short windows… even day-n-date… completely different story for limited release indies.
The big difference is that a major challenge for small releases is wide enough distribution to take advantage of their target market(s). So, if the only way someone can see a film outside of a major market is to watch it on DVD or VOD or PPV or whatever, the theatrical marketing push is often the best chance to make the other delivery methods succeed.
Studio movies are released under a completely different paradigm. A 2000+ screen release is ubiquitous. There are places that are not served… but they are a small minority of potential ticket buyers. The whole studio release business is build on the principles of mass marketing.
A scarcity model is not intentionally being used by either studio or indie distributors. But smaller indies don’t have the option of saturation.
The fantasy that the market and pricing will not contract if major distributors shorten the window is unfortunate and dangerous. But small indies are forced to live with what the majors create. If the prices for DVD and other home delivery go down for WB, it will be very hard for small indies to keep prices for home distribution up. You can Criterion it up as much as you like. If you try to fight price competition for DVD, you are narrowing your market.
So… I say “Go for it, indies. You are in a niche business and you need to use any angle you can to make it work financially.”
Studios… STOP!

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon