By Laura Rooney laura@moviecitynews.com

Critics Top Ten List 2010: Tom Tangney

Tom Tangney
KIRO Seattle

  1. Please Give
  2. Toy Story 3
  3. Inception
  4. 127 Hours
  5. The Social Network
  6. Garbo the Spy
  7. The King’s Speech
  8. Four Lions
  9. Waste Land/Exit Through the Gift Shop
  10. A Town Called Panic
Be Sociable, Share!

2 Responses to “Critics Top Ten List 2010: Tom Tangney”

  1. nancy merz says:

    The Kids Are All Right: a critique for your consideration
    The plot line lacks depth and complexity.The title is misleading. This is a story about the ups and downs of lesbian parents who are, for the most part, trying to get their own relationship right.Whether or not the kids are, or will be, all right, as a result of growing up with lesbian parents is a secondary theme, not clarified by story’s end. While I have no objection to portrayal of lesbian parenting, I did object to having to watch them getting off on porno movies and to the use of the f word so often as to become boringly inefective. As if the women characters were saying to the world, “Look how far weve come. We’re as capable of full blown potty mouth as any man!” So glad I didn’t suggest this one to my movie going friends! Nancy Merz Lake Stevens, WA

  2. nancy merz says:

    The King’s Speech

    All the major actors at their best. Colin Firth completely convincing.Being fact based made it even more appealing to this viewer. At the final scenes, my fellow viewers and I were edge-of-the-seat “willing ” the King toward success.Tops.

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon