By MCN Editor editor@moviecitynews.com

SONY PICTURES HOME ENTERTAINMENT LAUNCHES MY DAILY CLIP™ APP FOR iPAD, iPHONE AND iPOD TOUCH

Lets Movie Fans Discover New Films and Share Clips with Friends on Facebook

CULVER CITY, Calif., March 10, 2011 – Sony Pictures Home Entertainment today announced its My Daily Clip™App for iPad, iPhone and iPod touch is available on the App Store. The app brings users a library of thousands of films and serves up a new, high-quality movie clip every day.

The ultimate daily distraction for every movie fan, My Daily Clip users can turn otherwise wasted moments into the opportunity to discover or relive some of the greatest scenes in film, test their knowledge with trivia, share clips with friends via email or Facebook, and purchase full-length features directly on iTunes.

To optimize the viewing experience, this sleek and easy to use app adapts video quality to bandwidth and download speeds. Users receive a new movie scene on every day of the calendar year, and can search past clips by keyword or special themes. My Daily Clip draws from a library of thousands of films, including titles as diverse as Spider-Man, Bridge on the River Kwai, Superbad, Dr. Strangelove, Blackhawk Down, Ghostbusters, and many, many more.

“The My Daily Clip App is a great way to discover and share movies on your iPad, iPhone or iPod touch,” said Rich Berger, Senior Vice President, Worldwide Digital Strategy and Operations at Sony Pictures Home Entertainment. “This app gives the best of both worlds – instant gratification on-the-go with clips, and an easy link to buy the film for viewing on the go, or at home.”

The My Daily Clip is available for free from the App Store on iPad, iPhone and iPod touch, or atwww.itunes.com/appstore/.

# # #

Be Sociable, Share!

One Response to “SONY PICTURES HOME ENTERTAINMENT LAUNCHES MY DAILY CLIP™ APP FOR iPAD, iPHONE AND iPOD TOUCH”

  1. Jerry Reilly says:

    While on the app. Daily clip, How do I search for movies not shown on callender? Is that possible? How do I get to the theme section? Such as western, war, comedy etc. ?

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon