By MCN Editor editor@moviecitynews.com

Enter to Win Your Own Green Lantern Ring!

 
 

The  Rules Contest Rules: Drawing July 9, 2011 from entries received no later
5:00 p.m.(PDT) on July 6, 2011. You may enter once per day. One prize per person.

Be Sociable, Share!

29 Responses to “Enter to Win Your Own Green Lantern Ring!”

  1. Eileen Blackmore says:

    A very cool yet retro idea. In the 1950’s everyone wanted
    a ring or mug or lunchbox of a superhero or cowboy.

  2. Nikolas Bergquist says:

    .

  3. Nicole Schellhas says:

    I like the hoodie.. Great giveaway!

  4. doug devries says:

    COOL STUFF

  5. kathy weber says:

    awesome stuff

  6. Charles Goode says:

    Can’t wait to see the movie.

  7. jane jakins says:

    great movie

  8. Allison Wilson says:

    Awesome contest, thanks for the chance!!

  9. mary gallo says:

    Very cool. Thanks for sponsoring this cosmic contest.

  10. Joe M. says:

    Cool seems like its gonna be a good movie.

  11. Robert Noll says:

    Like the hoodie

  12. George Barksdale says:

    Looks like a great movie

  13. Larry Mendoza says:

    One of my favorites from when I was a Kid.

  14. Larry Mendoza says:

    I think this will be one of the best movies this year.

  15. Larry Mendoza says:

    looks like lots of action. I love this type of movie.

  16. Larry Mendoza says:

    I’d love to get this movie

  17. Larry Mendoza says:

    My grand son would love to see this movie.

  18. Larry Mendoza says:

    My grand kids would love to see this.

  19. Peter Piotto says:

    the movie was awesome, must see event

  20. Larry Mendoza says:

    I would love to see this movie.

  21. Larry Mendoza says:

    I would enjoy the movie to.

  22. Larry Mendoza says:

    Our kids would love this.

  23. Sharon Jones says:

    love to win. thanks!

  24. Annie Albro says:

    my grand children would love this prize

  25. Wanda Van Winkle says:

    I have several friends who would think a Green Lantern ring is awesome.

  26. Jennifer R says:

    My family really wants to see this movie. The merchandise would just be icing on the cake.

  27. DAVID KROMER says:

    LOVED THE MOVIE

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon