MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

2 Russ Meyers Memories

I have two memories from the Russ Meyer family.

I met the guy a few times, but not memorably. But Charles Napier, who is also a part of the Jonathan Demme film family, was on a bad movie that I wrote a while back and we got to talking about one of the late “works” of Meyers. Chuck told me that they found some new girls and packed into a van and headed out into the desert to shoot and when they wouldn’t perform the acts Russ wanted them to, Meyers and he and the other men in the crew hopped back into the van and abandoned these poor, young, hugely-breasted beauties out in the heat for a few hours. By the time the guys returned, the girls were desperate to perform.

When I told this story to Roger Ebert, a good friend of Meyers, he insisted that it could not be true and that Meyers never stopped to that kind of mean trick or even allowed his “actors” to engage in sex on his sets. But that protest always felt to me like it was Roger’s love for this director and friend more than a sure truth. And when Chuck Napier tells a story, God, it sounds Richard-Farnsworth-sincere.

My other memory is of Kitten Navidad, who I met and hung out with a bit back in New York about 20 years ago. She was doing a show for friends of mine at The Palladium. She was very sweet, and while her breasts were a bit too big for my tastes, still very sexy. Overtures were made, but I begged off. I remember the notion of romance seeming just so wrong. After all, I was 19. She was all of about 36… just soooo old!

And so, another tale of what morons young men can be…

Be Sociable, Share!

4 Responses to “2 Russ Meyers Memories”

  1. Yancy says:

    “Works”? “Actors”? Russ Meyer was a more naturally talented filmmaker than many of his more legitimate peers. I think he made a handful of near-great films, actually, especially the madhouse ones he made towards the end of his career. Bye, Russ.

  2. Jeff M says:

    Why post these ‘memories’, David? I see no useful purpose to the first one except to besmirch a dead man, if true. Seriously, it’s nothing but sour. Was that your full intent?

  3. Nick Masetti says:

    Sooo, are ya going to tell us what movie you wrote? IMDb has three David Polands, but none have writing credits (and am I mistaken in assuming that Polands II and III are both you? Presuming, that is, that you received special thanks in back of MANITO, a credit I puzzlingly overlooked at the time. Hell, it could even be that you’re all three of them, though I never heard of the movie wherein Poland I delineates the role of “Ali.”)
    As for Meyer, I agree with Yancy that he was a first-class filmmaker from a technical point of view at the very least — the pictures he photographed himself look better than any he handed to another cinematographer (even the Oscar-winning Fred J. Koenekamp), and I dare say he was as natural an editor as I’ve ever seen. I further agree that the later “madhouse” films are breathtakingly expressive, and it occurs to me suddenly that the one American director (who too is more popularly lionized now than at the time) he best compares to is perhaps Samuel Fuller.

  4. Tom Wondrock says:

    This was and was not what I was looking for, but I am glad it provided an answer for me. My father was a good friend of Mr. Meyers during the war. After my father’s passing, I found evidence to the truth of his stories. Including a comentary in which Mr. Meyers recounted a tale from his war duty. The information I was looking for was whether Mr. Meyers was still alive. I wanted to see if he might grant an interview of his days in europe.
    Thanks for this info.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon