MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Second Straight Day On The Cover Of Variety

Yesterday, MCN got a visual plug, though no mention, in a story about Hollywood and blogs. (I don’t see MCN as a blog, but it seems like a counterintuitive thing to say, given how hyper the off-line media is about blogging these days.)
Today, Gabriel Snyder wrote nearly the same story on the overstated box office slump as ran here on the blog on Monday. The only real difference was degree of detail, quotes from the usual suspects (some of whom were quoted by Sharon Waxman on Monday) and the failure to pin the hype on The New York Times.

Be Sociable, Share!

3 Responses to “Second Straight Day On The Cover Of Variety”

  1. bicycle bob says:

    mcn isn’t a blog. the hot blog is a blog. do these writers do their research?

  2. Joe Leydon says:

    Strictly speaking… and I admit, since we’re still, relatively speaking, in the Innovation Stage of blogging, or at most just a few steps into the Entrepreneurial Stage, and won’t reach the Stability Stage for years, so everything is still pretty much up in the air — you could argue that MCN does indeed fit the definition of a blog. That is, if you accept “blog” to mean a website where the host posts links to other news sites AND provides commentary of some sort. David’s barbed comments about certain publications and/or writers, albeit brief, would qualify as commentary by anyone’s definition, right? I mean, it’s not “just the facts, ma’am” (or, to be more precise, “just the links, ma’am”) like, say, Drudge’s website. (And even Drudge, come to think of it, occasionally links to his own… er, commentary.)The only question is, does a website also have to include reader comments to qualify as a strictly-defined “blog”?

  3. Terence D says:

    I think blogs are for personal views and thoughts. MCN is a news gathering site with links to blogs, articles, wesbites, etc.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon