blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
(nothing to write today)
amit on: Review: Frozen 2 (spoiler-free)
movieman on: BYOB Fall Back, Film Forward
Christian on: BYOB Fall Back, Film Forward
movieman on: Review: Marriage Story (spoilers only in the broadest sense)
movieman on: BYOB Fall Back, Film Forward
movieman on: Review: Frozen 2 (spoiler-free)
YancySkancy on: Review: Little Women (no spoilers)
Hcat on: Why You Should Be Afraid Of The End Of The Paramount Decree
movieman on: BYOB Fall Back, Film Forward
movieman on: I Should Be Doing Box Office
Review: Little Women (no spoilers)
Why You Should Be Afraid Of The End Of The Paramount Decree
Review: Frozen 2 (spoiler-free)
Review: Marriage Story (spoilers only in the broadest sense)
see all »
[twitter-widget username="DavidPoland" hiderss="true" hidereplies="true" hidefrom="true" items="3" showts="60" title=" " targetBlank="true"][twitter-widget username="MCNTweets" hiderss="true" hidereplies="true" hidefrom="true" items="3" showts="60" title=" " targetBlank="true"]
It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?
So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.
And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.
There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.
I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.
So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.
But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”
My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher
“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.
~ David Simon
Ennui has made more gamblers than avarice,
more drunkards than thirst, and perhaps as many suicides as despair.
~ Buddha
So you’re gambling, drinking and looking for the Right Way to do it?
The slow news season has arrived. Really, there is only so much one can say about The Island without thinking why?
Cool, I’ll use this post for my joke re: the ‘
USA Today Looks At Summer Through Michael Jackson Glasses’ headline.
wait for it…
Wacko Jacko?! There were 3 little GIRLS in that article.
Michael Jackson jokes just aren’t funny. He has a family that loves and supports him and is innocent until proven guilty. He needs our continued support.
All Michael Jackson needs is $300 million to pay off his debts.
You’re scaring me lefty. Michael Jackson is a freak and weirdo (what I never understand is why Jesse Jackson is always out there vocally supporting him, but that’s another story).
I know how much Michael Jackson wants to be a movie star, so maybe he could star in a sequel to Powder? I’d believe him as Powder. Or, maybe he could star in a movie about the director of Powder (or would that be too close to home for Michael?)
I love his 80’s music but, wow, what a trainwreck.
I’d say something about “War of the Worlds,” which I finally saw tonight, but I think that boat sailed a long time ago. In fact, so long ago it’s already been decommissioned and mothballed.
The wife and baby are out of town for a few days, so I am catching up on my movies, this week. Last night, I got to see Mr. and Mrs. Smith – much better than I thought it would. Fun, sexy, and entertaining. I am a huge fan of Doug Liman, so I would still say it’s his weakest film. But for me, that’s like saying that Casino is Martin Scorcese’s weakest film about the mafia. Pitt and Jolie have really never been better, with loads of chemistry. The film certainly felt like it was missing some scenes, but it moved briskly, regardless.
VGM, tonite, I saw War of the Worlds, as well. You don’t live in the Chicago area, because maybe we saw it in the same theater? I think DP is right on about this one. It was well done and all, but what REALLY was the point? The tries to be horrifying in points, thrilling in others, melancholy in others, and it just doesn’t gel together, at all.
SPOILER ALERT
I mean, the middle section potraying the brutality and desperation of the refugess if very effective, well done. But if you want to show the refugee experience and potray humanity at its weakest, then why the hell do you also need to have some heartening message by Morgan Freeman, in the end, about how humanity earned its place in the world? Come on, Steve, you can’t have it both ways. Same thing with the imagery. You can’t have 9/11-esque imagery followed 1 hour later with goofy alien action that you would have seen in Starship Troopers. I am really not sure what Spielberg was trying to do, with this film, but it is very obvious, now, that this was truly a rushed production, a locked in release date in search of a point. Very disappointed.
Michael needs out love and support. He has a had a rough childhood and needs us to be there for him. As a person.
Geoff–I did live in Chicago once, but that was many years ago. [SPOILERS FOLLOW: WARNING]
As to WOTW, I agree with you. It has some good moments and effective scenes–the burning train, the struggle over the van, the emergence of the first tripod. But overall it felt like scenes, not a coherent whole. It “tries to be horrifying in points, thrilling in others, melancholy in others, and it just doesn’t gel together, at all.” There’s no buildup, no trajectory. The movie really is about Ray getting his two kids back to his ex. I give credit to Spielberg for making his three main characters unsympathetic, but that doesn’t lead to anything. When the son says the only reason he’s trying to find the boy’s mother is because that’s all Ray can think of, the audience knows he’s right. But that’s still how it is at the end. And the end. Oy. It just happens. One minute he’s in Tim Robbins’ basement, the next he’s in Boston.
Spielberg telegraphs the resolution early in that scene where Dakota Fanning gets a splinter. She says something about how her body will expel it in its own time. Once I saw that, I expected it to be revisited at the end. I was disappointed this was not so. One other thing I think Spielberg had trouble with is in deciding what to show and what not to show. Restraint is good, but sometimes you need to show, not just imply. Show, don’t tell. But Spielberg doesn’t really tell, either. I won’t say anything about the absurd notion of the ships going undetected in the ground. It’s been pointed out already. Dave said in his review that there’s no tension, no real emotion. I couldn’t agree more.
One last note: I couldn’t get the video game “Half-Life 2” out of my head. The tripods as realized in the movie are a lot like something called Striders from the game. The difference being that on every level, the game is more compelling than this movie. For the rest, David Poland said it better than I could: “It didn’t suck. But it wasn’t very good either.”
http://www.thehotbutton.com/today/hot.button/2005_thb/050628_tue.html
I saw Batman Begins last night. Very good. Veeery good.
K Camel: Agreed.
Thanks for being a month behind.
michael jackson jokes are funny.
Did you know he will be on the secuel to reservoir dogs once they decide if he should play Mr. white or Mr. black?
Also on the secuel of hide and seek which will be titled hide on my bed and seek for help (outside L.A.
And in the secuel to the woodsman….
…the plastics man.
They are stupid but I’m proud of my jokes.
Finding the way out of neverland will spook audiences next fall.
Oh and talking about batman, I think I am the only person who didn’t like it.
But it’s my problem.
And i do think there was emotion at war of the worlds, Tom cruise has never been as good and dakota is exelent. It was very entertaining and not at all manipulative as many of other steven films, like schindlers list for example.
u preferred war to batman? what u smoking south of the border?
War of the Worlds was a good summer movie. But I don’t remember any of it and I just saw it. Batman is the type of film I’ll buy on dvd too.
How did you think Schindler’s was more manipulative than WOTW?
Do you really want to open up that can of worms from this obvious anti-semite, Jeff?
Who, Mex?
Yes, Mex. I think I know where he’s going with his thoughts and we all really don’t need to listen to jew hate talk.
Very well.
mex how was schindlers list manipulative? because a german saved jews from being exterminated and we were made to feel for them and him? sorry blu but i really want to hear this explanation.
“I think I know where he’s going with his thoughts and we all really don’t need to listen to jew hate talk.” and calling him an anti-semite?
Blustealer you have no idea where Mex’s “thoughts” are going because you didn’t ask him, and please don’t presume that you speak for us “all”.
I liked Schindler’s List alot but some aspects towards the ending (Neeson’s ‘breakdown’) were manipulative and had nothing to do with Judaism. I actually think it was one of the least emotionally manipulative of Spielberg’s movies overall, but that’s my opinion. Overall it was a great movie.
Schindlers List is a classic. One of the ten best films of all time. There should not even be a discussion on this. Case closed.
I can’t wait to hear mex’s theory of how the Holocaust never happend.
I think what everyone is wondering right now is, why didn’t they get Good Charlotte to perform the theme song for the new Dukes Of Hazzard movie?
Or, if it was 5 years ago, Sugar Ray?
I thought they were doing it? They do every movie aimed at 14 yr olds as it is.
I hate , I stress Hatred, that band.
er, Terrance, thanks for also being on top of things! You keep us informed!
ii loved everything about shindler’s list except Liam neesoms crying at the end.
My opinion is that scene which was manipulative wasn’t at all necesary, and it takes importance to whole movie.
I am not anti anybody except you maybe.
Excuse the writing, something’s wrong with my keybord.