MCN Blogs
Ray Pride

By Ray Pride Pride@moviecitynews.com

Jack on: more on Bogdanovich's Saint

Singapore-based UK-born journo Ben Slater offers more about the toil behind his forthcoming Saint Jack tome: “When I finally felt in a position to deliver the goods [to my blog], I ended up being strangely scooped by [Movie City Indie, which] spotted the online incarnation of an article about my activities that… was published last week in a… Singapore [paper,] TODAY… My aim was to research like crazy for 4 months and then write for 4 months, but as someone once said – a plan is a list of things that don’t happen – and that turned out to be exactly right. My first port-of-call was to be the director, Peter Bogdanovich and my ‘plan’ was to interview him first and then move on to everyone else. Well, tracking him down wasn’t too hard since I had been kindly given a contact for him through film critic Tom Charity. After emails had been sent and several weeks had passed, I got a reply – Bogdanovich was happy to talk to me. However, a window for the first phone interview couldn’t be arranged till late March, and so my research didn’t really begin proper till the moment I picked up the phone to Peter in New York and heard that distinctive mellow voice.After that things began to tumble into place in fits and starts…” After describing the process of his research, Slater offers, optimistically (Envoi!), “And this week I seriously begin writing the book in earnest. Here goes.”

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Movie City Indie

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon