MCN Blogs
Ray Pride

By Ray Pride Pride@moviecitynews.com

Up Wolf Creek: Craig McLean back down under

Before its premiere at the Melbourne International Film Festival, (and its fall release from the new incarnation of Dimension Pictures), Wolf Creek‘s Craig McLean has coffee and toast with The Australian’s Lawrie Zion: “Not everyone can see past the film’s grisly moments. One American reviewer said [the movie] would be nothing without its violence. “That [critic’s] an idiot, because the point of the movie is not violence,” McLean says. “What I’m fascinated with is the unbelievable randomness of [violence], that your life can be suddenly ended.” … McLean names British social-realist director Mike Leigh as an influence. “In a different way, if Mike Leigh shows a dramatic experience between people, the camera doesn’t just pan away from it. It will actually sit on the awkwardness of the moment where the characters don’t know what to do. I thought, what if you apply that kind of directorial technique to a B-grade slasher movie? So you take a B plot in which three kids go into the bush and get killed, which is every slasher movie in history. You shoot it like a Dogme film so it feels more real than real, and you make the acting like a Mike Leigh movie. At the same time you don’t shy away from the fact that it is incredibly Australian, and that it draws all its inspiration from true Australian crimes that we all know about… What it has going for it in the global marketplace is its point of difference. We’ve all seen lots of Australian movies where you get in a nobody American star to please some investors somewhere and try to make a half-American movie in Australia. As if you’re going to please someone by being more like them.”

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Movie City Indie

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon