MCN Blogs
Ray Pride

By Ray Pride Pride@moviecitynews.com

George Miller on narrative: You want nourishing, filling, fulfilling food

miller_narrowweb__200x300.jpg
While he’s near-silent on the cinema scene, George Miller wants to preserve Aussie television drama, speaking as “The Kennedy Miller Collection” is released on DVD: “George Miller, whose company Kennedy Miller has produced some of Australia’s most successful TV dramas [says]”If the quality is there, and it’s compelling, audiences will commit. Not only will they commit, they will also buy the DVD and watch it over and over again. And that’s the trick, how to make it compelling. If it speaks to the audience, we will listen.” …His relatively brief affair with TV, in partnership with the late Byron Kennedy, was extraordinarily successful. Between 1983 and 1989 Kennedy Miller produced The Dismissal, Bodyline, The Cowra Breakout, Vietnam, The Dirtwater Dynasty and Bangkok Hilton. Those landmark titles have just been released on DVD, a timely and perhaps uncomfortable reminder of the local TV industry’s capability. All were “pivotal stories in the Australian narrative”, Miller says. “And obviously there is something elemental about the stories, and if that is the case, they speak across time to us today.” … Australian drama accounted for just 575 hours of TV air time during the past financial year, figures published by the Australian Film Commission last month show, down from 722 hours in the late ’90s… Narrative, he says, is like good food. “You want nourishing, filling, fulfilling food. We seem to want it, and we’re able to invest the time, providing the story is good enough, so the question becomes how do you get something interesting out of all the noise out there?” … The real problem, Miller says, is much deeper and worrying, it’s the erosion of our Australian identity. “Our culture has been so watered down, that we are basically ersatz Americans as much as anything else, and the horse has bolted on that one… In the current ecology, it is almost impossible for Australian writers, actors, directors, producers to do good-quality material. It’s much more than just the fees they work with. It’s to do with even the understanding, at every level, that our culture shrivels up and dies unless you actively try to tell its stories.” [Photo: Steve Baccon for the Age]

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Movie City Indie

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon