MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Scary

Just saw two kids on The View who are having weight loss sugery. Both were about 25 -40 pounds overweight. Both were sitting next to parents who were built on the heavy side, so there was clear genetic predisposition.
Have we really gotten to the point where dropping 30 pounds is about surgery and not diet & exercise… especially when these kids are never going to be thin by the magazine cover standard, but can only hope not to have fat rolling over their belts?

Be Sociable, Share!

8 Responses to “Scary”

  1. Eric says:

    The problem with these people is not an extra thirty pounds. It’s a combination of distorted self-image, a media cocktail of embarassment and entitlement, and good old-fashioned fat-ass laziness. And any parent who allows their child to get this sort of elective surgery? You can bet they’re a big part of the problem.
    Do these kids think their life will be changed after one day of surgery? They probably do. But they suffer from a pathology that will always, always find more flaws that need to be fixed.

  2. bicycle bob says:

    real easy. u put the kids on a low fat diet. no junk food. no fast food. u make them do an hour a day of workouts. light weights, cardio, sports.
    just because they’re getting surgery doesn’t mean in 2 yrs the weight won’t come back on.

  3. spaceman spiff says:

    Let’s not be so quick to assume the problem is genetic. True, for some people, genetics play a major role in their body type, but it’s far more likely that the parents live an unhealthy lifestyle and the overweight kids are also a product of that lifestyle.
    Hopefully, this family will come to their senses and take up more practical measures.

  4. Josh says:

    Kids now don’t want to do the hard work. It takes dedication to be in good shape. Takes hard work. The easy way out never works.

  5. White Label says:

    I’m sorry, but any doctor who does an irreversible gastric bypass surgery on someone under 18 has no professional ethics.

  6. grrbear says:

    Stupid diet and exercise. Where’s that damn fat pill? A real weight-loss drug would make a company billions if they could just figure out how to keep the test subjects from having heart attacks.

  7. Mark Ziegler says:

    The kind of doctor that does this to kids? Should be sued for malpractice.

  8. Cadavra says:

    Because my severe sleep apnea is compounded by my weight, my doctor sent me to a surgeon that specializes in something called “lap rings,” which is a less invasive and extreme procedure than gastric bypass. Believe it or not, the surgeon told me I wasn’t fat enough to have the surgery! That had to be a first, especially in L.A.!

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon