MCN Blogs
Ray Pride

By Ray Pride Pride@moviecitynews.com

The half-and-half of human kindness: on screenwriting in LA cafs

cuppies4159.jpgLisa Rosen goes gonzo java in her contemplation of LA coffeehouses and public screenwriters in Written By: “There are so many coffeehouses in Los Angeles… it’s hardly believable that they could each garner enough customers to stay in business. Until you figure in the equally astonishing numbers of screenwriters in Los Angeles… While many of those laptop-toters may be screenwriters in the way the barristas serving them are actors, a surprising number are making a living at it, are even household names, at least in the households where screenwriters have names. Some of them even have offices of their own. So why seek out the noise and disruption and human population that’s found in a café? … Ed Solomon has been writing in coffee shops since before the café era. “Chris [Matheson] and I wrote Bill & Ted’s Excellent Adventure almost entirely in coffee shops. Our primary one was Ships, in Westwood. There was Norms in Santa Monica. Dolores’, we got kicked out of there.”… He often leaves his office on Montana Avenue to write at Café Dana around the corner. “But I especially like to go down to Koreatown and sit somewhere where there’s no English spoken or written anywhere. I feel like being in a different place gives me a clearer perspective.” … “A lot of people ask me how I can write in coffee shops, it’s so noisy, there are people working,” says [writer Dan] Wilson. “But in a way, especially when you’re working on something solo, there’s a lot of energy involved in coffee shops. It excites me. It makes me want to work too.” Another screenwriter observes this at a Westside Starbucks: “[A famous writer still] brings his little notebook, no laptop, sits there, and sort of stares somewhat angrily at the wall for about a half hour, then gets up and leaves. I think, So it’s still tough, huh. It’s good; it gives you hope.”

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Movie City Indie

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon