MCN Blogs
Ray Pride

By Ray Pride Pride@moviecitynews.com

Passion of the Caveh: a perverse pleasure in being rejected

I Am a Sex Addict essayist-auteur-protagonist Caveh Zahedi is working a fine trade in blunt namechecking at his own, indieWIRE-hosted blog, where earlier, he’s publicly micro-managed many of the publicity and distribution choices of IFC. IN “Dear Mr. Mark Cuban” Zahedi writes, caveh54321.jpg“Apparently, Mr. Mark Cuban (the very wealthy owner of the Dallas Mavericks) has decided to pull our movie from the Landmark Theater chain (which he owns) because his TV [channel], HDNET, wasn’t able to get on Comcast (which is airing [on] Video-on-Demand… starting this Wednesday). The film was set to open this Friday at a Landmark Theater in Berkeley. Postcards have been made and sent out. Posters have been put up. Articles have been written. But he has decided to nix our screening… Well, dear Mr. Mark Cuban, I know nothing about your beef with the folks at Comcast… but I made a film which your theater has advertised as opening this Friday, and I would argue that it’s not exactly considerate to just cancel the screening (without warning) only a few days before it’s set to open. There are people who have nothing to do with your Comcast disagreement who will be adversely affected by your peremptory actions. I know you can afford it (financially speaking), but it strikes me as not exactly in keeping with the high moral standard you yourself set in the Enron movie you produced (which I thought was excellent, by the way, my congratulations on that). I sincerely hope that you will reconsider your decision. Perhaps you didn’t realize the effect that your decision would have on others who wish both you and the Dallas Mavericks nothing but the best. Yours Truly, Caveh Zahedi. In “Success Hurts,” he describes a SF Chronicle profile by Neva Chonin, which he says is “phrased in ways that make the truth just incrementally more absurd and dramatic. I’m not complaining. I actually like it. But it’s like looking into a distorting mirror at the funhouse. It’s fun, but is that really how one looks?” Here’s some of Chonin’s take: “Caveh Zahedi has suffered for his art [but] nothing, however, compares to the terror of success.


Blinking in the sunlight and looking like a small, nocturnal animal in black jeans, Zahedi sits outside his San Francisco apartment and recalls the moments before his film, I Am a Sex Addict, won a Gotham Award as “Best Film Not Playing at a Theater Near You…” [Yr. correspondent was a member of the jury that awarded the prize.] “I was so nervous. I was hoping I wouldn’t get it so I wouldn’t have to go up and say anything… I was praying, ‘Please, God, don’t let it be me.’ …I think I have ambition, but I’m just really frightened… Of not being liked.” … As he putters around the book-strewn flat he shares with his third wife, Zyzzyva managing editor Amanda Field, Zahedi describes the film as both “an attempt to transcend wanting to be liked” and a quest to be loved without restraint. “It’s an infantile game you play where you don’t believe you’re lovable, so you push to see if there’s a point where the acceptance stops… It’s a similar dynamic with the audience: OK, will you still like me if I do this? And this? There’s a perverse pleasure in being rejected, I think.” [Much more to accept at the link, including an unlabeled spoiler to the film’s ending.]

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Movie City Indie

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon