MCN Blogs
Ray Pride

By Ray Pride Pride@moviecitynews.com

Fires were started: Is POV NSG for docs?

Doing some research before talking to the director of Who Killed The Electric Car?, I discovered that I had been contaminated by “docu-ganda” and was sternly advised to keep my brain open while witnessing such chuff, docco270.jpgor at least the Christian Science Monitor’s staff writer, Daniel B. Wood would caution us to be verrrrry skeptical: “In An Inconvenient Truth… former Vice President Al Gore asserts that global warming may soon eliminate one of the world’s great natural vistas: the snows of Africa’s Mt. Kilimanjaro.” In “Who Killed the Electric Car? celebrities such as Mel Gibson and Ed Begley Jr. lament the “murder” of General Motor’s EV1 electric car and the loss of California’s “most radical smog-fighting mandate since the catalytic converter.” (Slanting his case with an understated sneer at “celebrities” by the end of the first graf, Mr. Wood fails to footnote that celebrities were among the few consumers who could lease the cars, as they could yell louder than most if they were denied the chance.) “All deliver on the promise to tell an “untold” story, but is theirs the full story? Or even the true story? Don’t count on it, say media experts.” Ah! Media Experts! From the carrels of academe and public relations, curry their contributions! “The days when “documentary” reliably meant “inform the audience” – rather than “influence the audience” – are no more. The makers of such films today see their cinematic contributions as an antidote to media consolidation that, they say, restricts topics and voices to the bland and the commercial. humphrey jennings fires were started23e50.jpgAs such, they feel little or no obligation to heed documentary-film traditions like point-by-point rebuttal or formal reality checks. “We need to clarify that this new wave of ‘documentaries’ are not, in fact, documentaries,” says Christopher Ian Bennett of New School Media, a communications and public-relations firm in Vancouver. “They fail to meet the Oxford Dictionary definition, in that they editorialize, and opine far too much. They are entertaining…. But they can be dangerous if viewers take everything they are saying as the whole truth.” [Mr. Bennett is also a principal at Gryphon Television, whose site asserts “An evolving financial world needs new financial media… Gryphon Television is where Main Street and Wall Street connect; “New School Media” apparently lacks a website. An egregious bit of what somewhat resembles bought-and-paid-for pr hagiography makes amusing reading. An excellent timeline of the development of documentary form is here. The essential, complete Oxford English Dictionary does not contain Mr. Bennett’s definition for documentary, but rather, “of the nature of or consisting in documents; affording evidence, evidential; relating to teacher or instruction.” It’s in the same volume with drudgery, “The occupation of a drudge; mean or servile labour; wearismone toil; dull or distasteful work.” Hey, somebody’s gotta draw a paycheck for condescending to the intelligence of readers (and viewers).]

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Movie City Indie

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon