MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Posted Monday, December 15th, 2008 - 10 Comments »
Be Sociable, Share!

Because I Do Enjoy Crazy…

This has been coming over the e-transom, over and over again… and now, you can enjoy it!!!
IT IS NOT A SPAM, but if you received that message second and plus time JUST CLICK DELETE button and have a nice day. Don’t feel bad, please understand original Scarlett’s family very desperate to shout down that humiliating antichristian “actress” clones line career development. Hello dear Ladies and Gentlemen! I would like inform you that Scarlett Johansson (actress) actually is a clone from original person Scarlett Galabekian last name, who has nothing with acting career. That clone was created illegally by using stolen biological material. Original person is very nice (not d**n sexy),most important – CHRISTIAN young lady! I’ll tell you more,those clones (it’s not only one) made in GERMANY – world leader manufacturer of humans clones, it is in Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Rhineland-Palatinate, Mr. Helmut Kohl home town. You can not even imaging the scale of the cloning activity. But warning! Helmut Kohl clone staff strictly controlling all their clones (at least they trying) spreading around the world, they are very accurate with that, some of them are still NAZI type disciplined and mind controlled clones, so be careful get close with clones you will be controlled as well. Original person is not happy with those movies, images, video, rumors and etc. spreading on media in that way it would be really nice if we all will try slow down that ”actress” career development, original Scarlett will really appreciated that. Please remember that original Scarlett’s family did not authorize any activity with stolen biological materials, no matter what form it was created in it was stolen and it is stolen. It all need to be delivered to authorized personals control in Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles. Original Scarlett never was engaged, by the way! Her close friend Serge G. P.S. CONTROLLING ACTIVITY OF ANY CLONES IS US MILITARY OPERATION. H.R. 534, the Human Cloning Prohibition Act of 2003, was introduced to the U.S. House of Representatives on February 5, 2003. After discussion, it was passed on February 27 by a vote of 241-155. It now moves on to the Senate for consideration. This bill makes it unlawful for any person or entity to perform or participate in human cloning, or to ship or receive embryos produced by human cloning. The penalties are imprisonment of up to 10 years and fines of $1 million or more. These now join other nations as diverse as Norway, Australia, and Germany, which had already added cloning for any purpose to their criminal code. And in Germany where it carries a penalty of five years imprisonment they know a thing or two about unethical science.

Be Sociable, Share!

10 Comments »

10 Responses to “Because I Do Enjoy Crazy…”

  1. Armin Tamzarian says:
    December 16, 2008 at 1:04 am

    110% pure awesome. I am certain there is some truth to this and glad that word is finally getting out.

  2. yancyskancy says:
    December 16, 2008 at 1:22 am

    I, too, am glad that word is getting out, if it means I can get me one of those Scarlett Johansson clones. Two would be even better.
    Yes, I realize this is the obvious response, and likely shared by every heterosexual male who reads this news. But still.

  3. LexG says:
    December 16, 2008 at 1:26 am

    FUCK YEAH THAT OWNS THEY SHOULD CLONE KRISTEN STEWART AND ALISON LOHMAN AND CHRISTINA RICCI AND ALICIA KEYS NEXT.
    LIKE YOU COULD COLLECT THEM ALL kinda thing.
    GOOD IDEA.
    OH AND EVAN RACHEL WOOD AND PATRICK WILSON TOO.

  4. jeffmcm says:
    December 16, 2008 at 1:49 am

    Laughing, laughing, and then not laughing. I mean, Patrick Wilson? Really?

  5. York "Budd" Durden says:
    December 16, 2008 at 5:17 am

    Just because Lex is an inebriated attention hound doesn’t give you license to make fun of his bisexuality, Jeff. Decorum, please.

  6. Martin S says:
    December 16, 2008 at 6:37 am

    I’m with Armin. That’s awesome.

  7. DeafBrownTrashPunk says:
    December 16, 2008 at 9:00 am

    hahahahahahaha… WHAT THE F^#8K?@??
    that is hilarious…

  8. yancyskancy says:
    December 16, 2008 at 9:54 am

    Just keep the Patrick Wilson clone away from the Ellen Page clone.

  9. Jeffrey Boam's Doctor says:
    December 16, 2008 at 12:51 pm

    DP can we get a BYOB round here as I want to talk about a film I have been predicting for many months as the likely contender of Bomb of the Year and the best xmas gift since genital frostbite ie THE SPIRIT.
    Why no one smelt a colossal trainwreck eons ago is a mystery to me. The whole enterprise from start to finish stank of bad camp with no perceivable talent to elevate it to high camp. Blowing your xmas slot with a DOA title should see heads roll. Why didn’t they go earlier? Or even better, pull back the entire wasted marketing blitz and head to DVD.
    Hopefully the overrated Miller will be so shell shocked by this flop, that we won’t have to suffer any more of his juvenile journeys for sometime.

  10. Chucky in Jersey says:
    December 16, 2008 at 4:58 pm

    JBD forgot about “Delgo” and “Valkyrie”.

The Hot Blog

Comments Most Recent Archives

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon