It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?
So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.
And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.
There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.
I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.
So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.
But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”
My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher
“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.
~ David Simon
“We won’t be surprised when this one gets imitated.”
Oh, please.
Just make sure you come back and show such contempt when it happens, Grady.
Great. Now this can do for art at film festivals what weekend grosses did to art at the theaters…
No one will imitate it Dave because it’s flawed at the moment. Why not just have a simple ‘BUZZ’ indicator next to titles. It’d be more useful. The actual odds you post don’t relate to anything, and you say as much. Maybe if you could show how those odds came to be.. advance word, star power, previous film, easy sell, nice hook etc. Come up with little icons for each of these and then make a proper chart. Then you’d get imitated in EW.
I don’t see why this needs to be a Sundance thing – all year long, DP could make a scorecard of individual films’ and filmmakers’ worth in dollars. David Gordon Green > David Lynch > Harmony Korine and so on. Finally, quantifiable data to fill the void of all the vanishing ‘critics’.
Glad to hear the positive remarks about Adam Elliot’s Mary & Max. A friend of mine worked on the character designs in that and Harvey Krumpet was great so I’m definitely looking forward to it. It’s out here in April, does it have an American distrib?
What a cool chart-concept! Would be hilarious if it became one more tip sheet for obsessive gamblers to go to town on.
But if I was a gambling man, I’d probably go 2:1 on “September Issue,” actually.
Still waiting on this to be copied–or to be relevant at all…