MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

The Lonely Journey Of A White Suit In A Shit Storm

I sometimes forget the realities of the business I earn a living in… and then, yet another piece about raging bloggers and raging Traditional Media that obsesses on the personalities and not the work… and I am reborn.
I forget to appreciate that unsexiness of having an actual business that has earned its weight and more for the last five years without becoming a gossip blog or resorting to some of the bad choices that have forced some Old Media into New Media. Admittedly, ego lurks. It’s not really fun to see stories (even nasty stories) about all the new, unproven sites on the block – almost all of which will be out of business by this time next year – while no one in media can be bothered to notice the one business in this grouping that actually works for the industry, drives significant traffic daily to all the other sites without ego, and consistently turns a profit. Yawn. Much more fun to do the mud-wrestling story.
Why aren’t they throwing dirt my way? Thanks for not throwing dirt my way.
After a dozen years online… after all kinds of ego breaks… after all kinds of fights, public and private… I realize that I am peace when I am doing the work I choose to do, not worrying about others. But it is hard not to get involved (or want to get involved) in the soap opera of it all.
Sigh…
Back to work…

Be Sociable, Share!

3 Responses to “The Lonely Journey Of A White Suit In A Shit Storm”

  1. Joe Leydon says:

    “I realize that I am [at?] peace when I am doing the work I choose to do, not worrying about others.”
    Well, this explains a lot. You’re obviously not at peace very often, and never for very long.

  2. David Poland says:

    Thank you, Buddha.

  3. Joe Leydon says:

    That’s Bubba, son.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon