MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Crazy Nikki Has A New Gossip Daddy

It’s completely fitting that Nikki Finke lied about her absence from posting for days, claiming to be ill, and then erased the lie, and added her “sale” to an ambitious, if not yet successful web gossip conglomerate. (And oh yes, they have the mail.com url squat too.) This is Nikki’s idea of journalism. And so it goes.
What exactly did Mr. Penske buy? Well, he bought Nikki. That’s all that’s there, for better and for worse. Apparently, he has agreed to pay for a full-time east coaster – Roger Friedman? – who can suffer daily screaming that makes Harvey Weinstein look medicated and pump out – what else? – more gossip.
The hire is terrible news for the guy at Movieline, who not only will be forced to pull their punches and promote Nikki’s agenda under threat of hysteria. But given the balance of dollars on a world where Nikki doesn’t sell a lot of ads on her own, they will also be under immediate threat of losing their jobs… or worse… being the monkeys who dance at the end of Nikki’s rope if they want to keep their gigs.
The good news is for LA Weekly, where the distraction of a tabloider in their midst and the constant grind of servicing the demands of Nikki’s fragile ego is over. Obviously, they were not willing to pay what Nikki wanted. If losing her was a notable kick to VVM’s bottom line, they would have kept her.
Anyway… glad she got what she wanted… glad she’s in the appropriate kind of company now (a wannabe web “syndicate” with no tether or even a claim to anything journalistic)… glad to see VVM and its journalists clear of her… nothing much has changed… new people for Nikki to scream at… same URL… same gossip…
I only hope that the guys at Movieline will actually be given a mission statement, now that the gaping gig is filled with another site, that befits their more lofty personal skill sets.

Be Sociable, Share!

12 Responses to “Crazy Nikki Has A New Gossip Daddy”

  1. gradystiles says:

    Ok, so I was wrong. Only 334 words.

  2. David Poland says:

    I know you don’t get it, Grady. Sorry.
    If you wanted a long post about it, the NYT would have had to have hired her. I have already suggested that Variety hire her. But they won’t because her journalistic standards would be too problematic, even for a trade paper… and they would be culpable, no matter how gullible her readers can be.
    This “purchase” is insignificant, except that I fear it will put more people of quality out of work in time. Water found it’s level. No biggie.

  3. LYT says:

    According to LA Observed, the print column will continue at the Weekly.

  4. RP says:

    According to The Wrap, Mail.com paid $14 million:
    http://tinyurl.com/l9epcl

  5. LexG says:

    14 MIL??? Holy shit, the comments section there isn’t even entertaining.
    Bidding for rights to The Lex Blog, my columns and my animations shall now begin at $1,400 and a VHS copy of “Nobody’s Perfekt.”

  6. Joe Leydon says:

    My father, God rest his soul, was right: This truly is the land of opportunity.

  7. 14 mil? Wow. Wow. I doubt it. But even that it’s being floated around. Wow.

  8. don lewis (was PetalumaFilms) says:

    Yeah, I too wanted to chime in with a HOLY SHIT on the reported $14 million. That’s just….nuts. I’ve never read Finke nor do I care to, but you gotta give it up for her doing *something* right. That’s an “only in America” sized payday.

  9. waterbucket says:

    I don’t get it. D-Po always harps on Nikki for being crazy and loud and obnoxious. But then he chooses to shove LexG in our faces, who is also crazy and loud and obnoxious. Hmmm… Look like you also respond to the one who’s the loudest in the room. Thanks D-Po.

  10. Harley says:

    Not that accuracy is ever a subset of jealousy, but in truth, Finke has not left the LA Weekly thus far. And they want her to continue her weekly column.
    No biggie. Heh.

  11. Cadavra says:

    Hey, Penske: for $14,000 I’ll write whatever you want me to and I won’t ever use the word TOLDJA!

  12. sharonfranz says:

    Good for her. I’m still amazed at how much some companies are willing to pay for websites, nowadays, especially in a recession. 100,000 unique visitors won’t make you much in terms of advertising. It’ll make enough to give one person a decent salary, but not really enough to support a team.
    Also, this purchase doesn’t make any sense. Mail.com already has MovieLine.com. Why another movie site? How are they gonna work together?

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon