MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Soupy Sails Away

Soupy Sales was one of those legendary characters of television who I was a little late to discover, missing the full impact of his magic. But from the first time anyone got an eyeful of that smile and that gentle, goofy energy, you had to love the guy.
I was unaware of it at the time, but he was the distinctly Jewish uncle any kid might want. He was silly, happy to be the butt of jokes, and while undeniably a grownup, one of us. I know it may seem a little odd to note his jewishness with Jewish performers dominating so much of early television, but so many of “us” were trying to be less Jewish and while Sales didn’t wear a yamaka, there was comfort in the Northeastern ethnicity of his gentle growl.
One of the best remembered events of all early television is Sales’ call on New Year’s Day to kids to take “little green pieces of paper” out of their parents’ pants and purses and to send them to him at the TV station.

And of course, there was Match Game…
SoupySales.1.jpg

sales
soupy-sales3_mam.jpg

Be Sociable, Share!

3 Responses to “Soupy Sails Away”

  1. adorian says:

    I don’t know if this is true or if it’s an urban legend, but supposedly on live TV, he got away with the following: He and one of the puppets were studying letters of the alphabet. Soupy would say the letter “F” was “F.” The puppet would say it was “K.” Soupy then supposedly asked, “How come every time I see “F,” you see “K”?
    I hope it’s true because it’s just too good not to be.

  2. Cadavra says:

    Absolutely brilliant, spontaneous and hilarious. I loved how he would address the crew–who could often be heard laughing–to the point that you almost felt like you knew them, even though they never appeared on camera. We will not see his like again.

  3. Bob Violence says:

    Sales insisted he never got dirty on the air (unless you count this) and had a standing reward for anyone who could prove otherwise. And this is better than moth-eaten dirty jokes anyway.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon