MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Must View: No Subtitles Necessary: Laszlo & Vilmos

Next Tuesday on PBS, Independent Lens will present a documentary that is an absolute must for movie lovers. Watch it, DVR it, whatever… but make sure to check it out. (And please note: when the film plays on your PBS station may vary… check your listings.)
The film, by James Chressanthis, is not a masterpiece of doc filmmaking. But he does a wonderful job of capturing the movie history and personal history of two of the industry’s most legendary cinematographers. Easy Rider, Five Easy Pieces, McCabe and Mrs. Miller, Deliverance, Paper Moon, Close Encounters of the Third Kind are just the start of their credits.
And what you get here that is so hard to get from most looks at the industry is the humanity of these men and the men and women they worked with over these decades. Sometimes they are craftsmen, sometime fine artists, but long a part of memories that stick to the hearts and minds of movie lovers everywhere.
Like I say… I can’t call this a defining movie or a breakthrough in doc filmmaking… it’s just a really good film on a really wonderful subject. And it has stayed with me, joining my thoughts about so many of these great films quite often since I first saw it a few weeks ago.

Be Sociable, Share!

4 Responses to “Must View: No Subtitles Necessary: Laszlo & Vilmos”

  1. Aris P says:

    Thank you for the heads up.
    I had the pleasure (and honor) of interviewing Vilmos a few months ago for a Conrad Hall mini-doc. He’s the epitome of class.

  2. Rothchild says:

    It’s on Thursday.

  3. christian says:

    Two absolute masters of style and class.

  4. David Poland says:

    Added to the entry, Rothchild. PBS says the film premieres on Tuesday, but different stations do play it at different times.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon