MCN Blogs
Ray Pride

By Ray Pride Pride@moviecitynews.com

DVDs: Moon

Duncan Jones’ first feature is a muscular feat of the mind, compacting a myriad of movie influences into a feat of concentration, and for Sam Rockwell, a tour-de-force role. It’s almost impossible to talk about the film without revealing what in other films would be a twist but in the (reportedly) $5-million-budgeted Moon(Sony, $28) is its raison d’etre. Trailers, posters and interviews have all pretty much given away the game, which still, doesn’t hurt this compact gem. Alone on the far side of the moon, Sam Bell is a miner capturing Helium-3, which has moon_sam_duncan_567.jpgbecome earth’s primary source of energy. (Unobtainium, sadly, is unobtainable.) Sam’s weeks away from the end of his three-year contract with Lunar Industries. But he’s also getting headaches, hallucinations, failing to focus. [Spoilers follow]. Recovering from a disorienting accident, Sam gets a perplexing surprise in the form of a younger, angrier version of himself who believes he’s just arrived for his own three-year stint. (Kevin Spacey is wry as the voice of “Gerty,” the site’s controlling computer.)
Since the film’s first festival hsowings, Jones has talked about the 80s being the grimy industrial age of science fiction, a golden era with Blade Runner out in front. “Well, I think so,” the 38-year-old director tells me in his gentle English accent. “Films like Silent Running and Outland and Ridley Scott’s Alien, I think they, y’know, they were telling stories about people. The science fiction [element] was really the environment these people were contrasted against. It’s how people were affected by, or how they were able to protect themselves from these future environments, or alien environments in science fiction settings. It was always about people, and they were always quite smart. I think nowadays you only have to look at the science fiction films coming out this summer and it’s just a litany of going from one very expensive special effects setpiece to the next, with these archetypal lantern-jawed heroes. And, and this is a very different kind of film that goes back to that earlier, I think, more interesting period.”
“Empathy. Humanity. How do you define these things? I wanted to address these questions,” Jones wrote in a director’s statement. I’d seen “Food, Inc.” directly before our interview, which makes a chilling parallel to Sam’s fate: the worker, the animal and the consumer all are equally disposable. Moondepicts a kind of meat factory, too. “Yeah, absolutely. It’s the energy industry [in Moon] and the tongue-in-cheek thing we have is that Lunar Industries is actually a green energy company. Even companies with the best intentions, if they’re profit driven, are going to find places to cut corners and in our case, Sam is one of those corners.”
In a way, Rockwell’s playing three characters, since you call him Sam in the movie. Sam and Sam but he’s also… Sam. Jones laughs. Is there a goofy reason for well, Sam and Sam and Sam? “More than goofy, I mean, that was a conscious… It was written for Sam Rockwell. And as soon as we got our head around what we wanted to do with the film and what the story was, moooooon_6789i.jpgthe fact that the character would be a clone, I thought, well, we’ve got to call him ‘Sam,’ so that when Sam’s reading it, we immediately put him in the uncomfortable position of his own character, y’know, make him feel awkward and weird about reading his name all the time. So I thought that was a nice little thing we could do to help immediately put him in the right headspace. I think it was one of the things that made it just a little more interesting to him.” Cronenberg’s Dead Ringers has to be an important predecessor. “Yeah, yeah. That was hugely beneficial to us, the Criterion edition of that. I was looking at tech stuff, Sam was looking at how Jeremy Irons was differentiating his characters. So we both had things that we got from that Criterion DVD. And then Spike Jonze’s Adaptation as well.”
Moonfunctions as its own solid feat of storytelling, even with its wealth of its nods to earlier movies. (The titles do lovely things with the style of the opening David Fincher’s Panic Room.) An odd detail I wondered about: The moon base is named Serang, a word that searches suggested might have appeared in an Edgar Rice Burroughs novel, and I came up with the Sanskrit word for peacock. Jones laughs. “Well, I hate to break it to you. It’s neither of them. Serang is the Korean word for ‘love’ and I am a hopeless romantic. My girlfriend at the time of writing and during the shoot was a Korean woman. I was going through a heartbreaking long distance relationship with her. She’d have to move back to Seoul for work. So the whole storyline of long distance relationships, and how painful they can be, was all coming out of my experiences going through that. So the fact that Lunar Industries was sort of a collaborative United States-Korean company and that the base was called Serang all came out of that.” A further odd synchronicity I found is that the Indian Army’s ceremonial helicopter corps is called Serang and the helicopters they fly are called HAL, just like the computer in 2001. “Huh! That’s very interesting!” Jones laughs. “Either I’m far smarter than you realize, or the truth, which is I had no idea! That’s very cool, though.”

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Movie City Indie

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon