May 16, 2024
The Hot Blog
amit on: Review: Frozen 2 (spoiler-free)
movieman on: BYOB Fall Back, Film Forward
Christian on: BYOB Fall Back, Film Forward
movieman on: Review: Marriage Story (spoilers only in the broadest sense)
movieman on: BYOB Fall Back, Film Forward
movieman on: Review: Frozen 2 (spoiler-free)
YancySkancy on: Review: Little Women (no spoilers)
Hcat on: Why You Should Be Afraid Of The End Of The Paramount Decree
movieman on: BYOB Fall Back, Film Forward
movieman on: I Should Be Doing Box Office
Review: Little Women (no spoilers)
Why You Should Be Afraid Of The End Of The Paramount Decree
Review: Frozen 2 (spoiler-free)
Review: Marriage Story (spoilers only in the broadest sense)
see all »
[twitter-widget username="DavidPoland" hiderss="true" hidereplies="true" hidefrom="true" items="3" showts="60" title=" " targetBlank="true"][twitter-widget username="MCNTweets" hiderss="true" hidereplies="true" hidefrom="true" items="3" showts="60" title=" " targetBlank="true"]
Quote Unquotesee all »
It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?
So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.
And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.
There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.
I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.
So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.
But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”
My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher
“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.
~ David Simon
AWESOME, only a 2 and a half year wait. Thank God they got that press release out.
Now what to do until 2012?
“The new film which is still untitled,”
Quick! Somebody get the trademark to “AVATAR 2”!
“AWESOME, only a 2 and a half year wait. Thank God they got that press release out.
Now what to do until 2012?”
Ummm…pray that John Cusack’s movie was a prophecy?
“we
I loved the 3D in Avatar, but no thank you. Looks like I’ll be paying to see less movies this summer and the ones after if they’re all going to be in 3D.
Gotta be “The Amazing Spider-Man,” no?
I suspect what will happen is once the novelty of 3D wears off, 3D-for-3D sake movies will start losing out to equivalent 2D movies as audiences decide that the extra cost isn’t worth it (assuming there are sufficient 2D tentpoles to provide competition). The extra revenues from the price bump wont compensate for the lower ticket sales and higher cost, so the number of 3D movies will drop until they hit an equilibrium where the 3D is only used for movies where the audience experience actually benefits, which will likely be a minority of releases. Standard business cycle economics.
In the meantime though, expect a glut of 3D movies to come through as studios try to ride the boom while it lasts.
It’s probably gonna be ‘Amazing Spider-Man’ or, if they’re going full-Bendis, ‘Ultimate Spider-Man’.
“Gotta be “The Amazing Spider-Man,” no? ”
Seems logical. Which of course means they’ll probably call it Spider-Man Extreme or The Spider-Man or something.
Well, at least the title will give plenty of opportunities for headlines such as “The Not-So-Amazing Spiderman” or “The Mediocre Spiderman”.
I think it should be “The Astounding Arachnid-Homo Sapiens”