MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Toronto Sales

So… the count of sales coming out of the 2010 Toronto International Film Festival is a dozen. Some would have the count at 14, but that would be counting 2 sales that undeniably happened before the fest. And I would say there are a couple more on that border. But 12. Out of about 80 films on sale.

The number is not terrible, given the market for markets. But I am fascinated by the sudden rush to put TIFF on our shoulders and to proclaim it as savior. (Note: I have been saying that TIFF is the most important festival in the world for years… and multiples more important to North America than Cannes.) Perspective, please.

Sony Pictures Classics will release 20 films this year. They picked up 2 “at” TIFF, one of which went into distribution in its native Canada this weekend (Incendies) and the other of which was a pre-fest deal with producer Robert Lantos, with whom they have a long happy relationship, for another Canadian film, Barney’s Version.

That’s it for the studio Dependents.

The are only two significant pick-ups out of TIFF so far this year, in my opinion. The first is Lionsgate grabbing Rabbit Hole, which will be very difficult to sell commercially, but could kick in a Best Actress nomination for Nicole Kidman. As noted here before, the sale was contingent on a 2010 release and campaign, which will leave LGF competing in the Actress category with its own For Colored Girls….

The second weighty pick-up is The Weinstein Company paying a preemptive $3 million for Dirty Girl, which is widely seen as a “we’re still here” deal. (The distributor also picked up Submarine, a well-liked tweener… exactly the kind of film the company has been unable to launch over the last few years.)

After that, we are into the significant, but definitively second tier of rising and wannabe distributors.

Oscilloscope is a beautiful place and picking up the next Kelly Kelly Reichardt film, Meek’s Cutoff, is no surprise. But getting Wendy and Lucy to almost $1 million was an achievement and this new film is generally seen as less accessible.

Roadside Attractions is hard charging and picked up the doc, Cool It, before TIFF. They are also involved with Lionsgate in picking up The Conspirator and Everything Must Go… but it’s not completely clear what these deals really are. Are they really Purchases or are they Service Deals, pieces of business in which Lionsgate will pay Roadside to handle distribution while they look for profit in DVD?

IFC, which is the digital-leaning version of Sony Classics, really, hasn’t hit $3 million with a film since they went to the VOD concept and that high grosser was the Joan Rivers doc. They should do fine for SUPER, Cave of Forgotten Dreams, and Peep World, but no one high profile film goes to a major fest hoping that IFC will be their home. Again, I think IFC does a great job in the context of their aspirations. I am an IFC fan. But in pure business terms, IFC is a really good state school that you end up at when your first choices say, “no.”

Anchor Bay got a theatrical to $6 million this last year, so their transition from DVD distrib to theatrical is going okay. They grabbed another dead child movie, one that’s more controversial (they must hope) than Rabbit Hole, Beautiful Boy, which sports two very strong performances by Maria Bello and Michael Sheen.

Then we have the genre arm of Magnolia, Magnet Releasing, grabbing the well-liked niche film I Saw The Devil. Great… but $200k is about their theatrical top.

And finally, two brand new distributors grabbed two films. One, Casino Jack, has a strong Kevin Spacey turn and a high-profile subject… and now, an unknown distributor in ATO Films.

Women Make Movies describes itself as a “national non-profit feminist media arts organization whose multicultural programs provide resources for both users and producers of media by women.” Great. But Kim Longinotto is a major documentarian and I am not sure that WMM, a terrific organization, counts as a Sale. It’s much more like a small video deal for Pink Saris that is being positioned as a Sale in a tough market.

And there will be more deals in the wake of the festival. Someone will take Beginners. When Errol Morris is ready to make a deal, Tabloid will be sold. Someone – probably Magnet – will bring 13 Assassins to the US. Daydream Nation, Henry’s Game, The Vanishing on 7th Street, The Ward, and The Whistelblower will all land somewhere, depending on the deals and the marketplace. Even What’s Wrong With Virginia, well hated as it is by so many, will find a place with a strong VOD plan.

What is interesting, to me, is that a few of these titles are the kind that were sure bets… and no longer are. A movie like The Whistleblower should be getting Oscar-chase interest for Rachel Weisz… but was late in the festival and may be too serious for buyers. Daydream Nation isn’t hard to see as Easier A. Screen Gems could take the elements of something like The Ward and open strong.

That is the story of TIFF 2010, in sales and otherwise… it is an effective domestic launching pad because it is so close to the release dates. And it is a great festival for people who love movies. But as a market, it is, like all the others, just not how movies are really sold anymore.

(edited 3:19p, as I didn’t know Potiche had been sold)

Be Sociable, Share!

6 Responses to “Toronto Sales”

  1. Tom says:

    Do you think The Whistleblower will get a distributor? It would be a shame if it did not considering the praise Rachel Weisz has gotten for her role.

  2. SJRubinstein says:

    That “best and worst of TIFF” National Post story linked off of MCN is awesome:

    Best anecdote
    “We were debating the ending of the film. The producers wanted one ending, I wanted a different one. Was it going to be a happy or pessimistic ending? I had a bad back from carrying the camera … I was getting a massage in Mexico. I was contemplating how the film should finish and, in the middle of the massage, the woman leaned over to my ear and whispered: ‘Happy ending?’” — Gareth Edwards, director of Monsters. M.L.

    Read more: http://arts.nationalpost.com/2010/09/17/the-best-and-worst-of-tiff-2010/#ixzz0zvqBrPsr

    And man, “The Ward” is a polarizing film.

  3. David Poland says:

    I think Whistleblower will land somewhere… the question is whether it will be a bigger distributor and whether the film will land intact. There has been some talk about some of the scenes being too harsh. Thing is, if it were Romanian-made, it would be being touted as a sure lock for at least a Best Foreign Language nomination and people would be trying to get the actress in the lead to America. We like our unpleasant art better with an accent. Embarrassing.

    And as for The Ward, it’s too silly to hate. Anyone who does has got a stick up their ass. On the other hand, it is profoundly flawed, especially the last act. So I’m not saying it’s my favorite film. But it doesn’t matter if geeks love or hate it, the sales pitch is to teen girls who love Japanese-style horror. Six distinct girl types… all have their moment… plenty of dark, creepy stuff to threaten audiences with. If I were a marketer at Screen Gems or Lionsgate, I’d be all over it, whether I liked the film or not. A $15m – $25m opener. As a businessperson, an easy call.

  4. marychan says:

    I heard that “The Ward” is likely to get R rating. So I guess Screen Gems won’t release this film. Unless John Carpenter will be willing to make some edits to get PG-13 rating (commercially, it may be what John should do; teen girls like to watch PG-13 horror films in theaters, not so much for R-rated horror films) .

    On the other hand, a SPWAG acquisition “Insidious” is a perfect film for Screen Gems; because the film is from the director of “Saw” and it is very likely to get PG-13 rating. I guess Screen Gems will agree to release “Insidious” and make it to become a box office hit.

  5. Bob Burns says:

    Did every one of those 80 films actually expect to get sold? My guess is that just getting into TIFF was the fulfillment of expectations for most of the filmmakers.

    Lots of great professional theater never gets out of Toronto, either. Still great, though.

  6. leahnz says:

    “We like our unpleasant art better with an accent. Embarrassing.”

    interesting insight, DP

    ftr i’m a completely infatuated fawning fool for rachel w, a goddess amongst mere mortals, a superb actress and fine human being. can’t wait to see her in ‘the whistle blower’ (can’t wait but no doubt i’ll have to because sometimes it sucks being out in the middle of fucking nowhere)

    and just to say i can’t relate to anyone who isn’t at least rooting for J carpenter, legend

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon