MCN Blogs

By DP30

DP/30: The Social Network, editors Angus Wall, Kirk Baxter

mp3 of the conversation

Be Sociable, Share!

6 Responses to “DP/30: The Social Network, editors Angus Wall, Kirk Baxter”

  1. Martin says:

    Gonna watch this later tonight I thought the editing was great in TSN. Any chance we will get a DP/30 of Marky Mark? He’s coming into his own as a producer IMO and it’s funny bec I think his ultimate goal is to be a studio exec.

  2. David Poland says:

    We missed him on junket day for The Fighter and haven’t been offered him since… I assume because I am on the “wrong side” of the film. One of these days. I think highly of him and his ability to get things done without becoming seen as a jerk by almost anyone.

  3. Martin says:

    I guess since you weren’t 100% onboard the Fighter the PR folks might be a bit more reticent, but u still liked the film no? I think this site is a good place to get the word out amongst a decent # of the voters, so it would be foolish not to get a nice DP30 on the books

  4. witherholly says:

    I love these late 80’s success stories. P.S. No words can ever describe how hard these jobs are. Congrats! P.S.S. Please get The Fighter’s Pam Martin.

  5. Captain Celluloid says:


    Very nice interview. Real good No Spin insider-ish insight on how these guys approach editing, how FIncher approaches directing for editing and how he deals with his editors. Extremely informative and hey, they seem like real nice normal guys. Sounds like a nice gig.

  6. John in LA says:

    Thanks Dave for posting this! It will be listened to – especially after their win last night.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon