MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Hysterical! Nikki Ceases & Desists Sharon

I love this so.

The ultimate in entertainment journalism ouroboros…

In this corner, the madwoman who threatens everyone she talks to with excluding them from her site’s increasingly deep in minutiae, uninteresting coverage of the industry, thus gaining her “exclusives” of anywhere from as much as 6 hours to as little as 3 minutes.

In the other corner, one of the least well regarded journalists ever to cover the movie business beat, she does steal content, though she passionately defends the behavior as “the way it is” like her idol, Arianna. But primarily, that acquisitiveness comes from bigger outlets than Deadline.

It’s hard to know who to root for. Nikki is right on some level. But Nikki’s definition of EXCLUSIVE is self-serving and to so degree, absurd.

You have to respect the game as it was set up decades and decades ago. The person with the relationships that get them the first sniff of the press release posing as news gets the Exclusive. People have earned a lot of money for having those relationships, Michael Fleming right up at the front of that line. But we’re not a two trade, no interest in reporting town anymore.

Almost nothing printed on Deadline is “news” as the front page of a newspaper would define it. Someone wants the word out. They give it to the person who is the best strategic fit. It can be about that outlet being the best one for the news to come from or it can be, as noted above, that they are feeling threatened by a “journalist” and they’d rather protect themselves than risk a fight that can go right to the top of the studio. There is no bigger context developed by reporting, as a rule. it’s just today’s press releases and who gets handed what.

Nikki has done a brilliant, horrible job of taking control of this game. There is no question that she dominates. But she dominates with fear-based manipulation, not journalism. In hiring some of the best liked writers out there, she has both kept herself at a distance. But her rage still drives her mythology.

The irony of this cease & desist remains… people give information to Deadline to get it disseminated, not so Nikki can rage on about exclusives and toldjas. They want Sharon and everyone else with a website to “steal” the story and spread it. More often than not, every potentially interested journalist’s phone or e-mail inbox rings with the “news” within an hour of Deadline (or LAT… or NYT… or whomever…) running it.

It’s comedic that anyone would try to use the Hot News Doctrine to maintain control of entertainment news. Seriously. It is to laugh.

Not as funny as, “It often can take weeks of working our deep sources to report and write our posts,” however. Yeah… holding a story for weeks because your source wants you to or has negotiated with you to do so is not “working deep sources for weeks” in my journalistic book. Nor should it for you readers.

And with all due respect, how does Nikki or anyone else know what Sharon and her minions are reporting and what they are stealing? This is the part I am excited to see, hoping a lawsuit develops.

This is the problem with most of the lawsuits – including the ones threatened against me and never C&Ded… feeling left out – Nikki conjures up. She’s have to prove that Waxman is not reporting these stories. Cue the line up of Nikki Whisperers, for all of Hollywood to see and the owners of the corporations to see. Her sources would have to stick up for her in court. I want to see Ron Meyer on the witness stand explaining how he gave information to Nikki and refused it to Sharon or Variety or LAT… and why.

Of course, the real question about all of this legal wrangling is, “Why now?” Is the answer the photo of Nikki that Sharon published? Is it competitive anger over the Motion Picture Home story? Was the award season, the advertising part of which basically ended yesterday, not quite what Nikki hoped? Does Nikki see a chance to kill off The Wrap once and for all? Or could this all be a conspiracy to get Bill Condon to make Sharon a character on The Nikki Show?

Of course, Sharon and her backers are not Deadweird Hollywood. Not quite as easy to take down. But The Wrap could be teetering. And this could scare away another round of funding. And then, I think Sharon’s suit against Nikki would be more fun!

Is Nikki forgetting that the first rule of Source Club is not talking about Source Club? Could it backfire hard on her?

All I have to do is sit back and watch. I don’t really read either site much anymore. Deadline is mostly the parts of the trades I never read even back when they were The Trades and The Wrap has occasional moments of being interesting… but few and far between. I like Steve Pond and for a guy who has hated on me, Jeff Snieder does it in a funny way. So I’ll have to see the battle light up on my RSS feed.

“EXCLUSIVE: I’ve learned 2-time Oscar winner and Academy favorite Tom Hanks will be the first presenter and name winners in both the Art Direction and Cinematography categories right off the bat. ”

WOW… that’s important news worth suing over, Pete Hammond! Bring on the lawyers!!!

LMAO.

Be Sociable, Share!

3 Responses to “Hysterical! Nikki Ceases & Desists Sharon”

  1. First of all, I’m flattered to be included in this piece, but come on, DP. Hated on you? I read your site every day and like you perfectly fine, was happy for you when you became a daddy. I’ve always wanted to be invited into the cool circle after screenings and other events I’ve seen you at but I don’t think I’m viewed as elite enough to take part in those conversations. I may criticize you from time to time, but deep down, I’m a fan who respects the hell out of you and what you’ve done over the years. Of course, I’ve said the same thing to Nikki in the past, but that hasn’t gone over so well.

    Anyways, this whole C&D is a giant scare tactic. Nikki can’t copyright the news. She doesn’t provide a single specific example in that letter, and even if she could, I could provide a dozen examples of Deadline doing the exact same thing. Nothing will come of this C&D. Business will go on as usual. It was just Nikki being Nikki and doing it just as TheWrap was about to throw its Oscar party. Real peach, huh?

    If you wanna go to lunch to hash out our imaginary differences, it’ll be my treat. I know I can be prickly at times, but get to know me and you’ll see a softer side…

  2. ThePlaylist says:

    So cute to watch Jeff flirt around asking Poland out on a date. I hope you get to 2nd base.

  3. And ThePlaylist strikes again with their witty, Brooklyn-based snark. How does one say “pretentious poser” in hipsterese?

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon