MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

6 Weeks To TIFF: a 20 weeks to oscar prequel (part 2 of 3)

Yesterday, the TIFF roll-out started with titles that will be high-profile at TIFF ’11, but are not potential Oscar-race late entries. Today, 10 titles that are currently without US distribution partners, but could end up not only getting released in 2011, but could be players in the race, either in Best Picture (less likely) or any of the acting or writing categories (much more likely).

Of course, all or any of them could end up stinking. And such is the fun of the TIFF shake-out.

(in alphabetical order)

360, director Fernando Meirelles

Meirelles remains on of the most interesting directors working. This film seems to be a drama with strong sexual themes. Written by Peter Morgan and starring Rachel Weisz and Jude Law – famously paired in Enemy At The Gates – as well as Anthony Hopkins and Ben Foster… all Oscar bait talent. (Forster is the only one never nominated… but has been buzzed repeatedly in recent years.) The script is based on an Arthur Schnitzler’s classic play, La Ronde, which pairs up couples then follows one member of each pairing to the next pairing. (Anything Schnitzler may scare some after Eyes Wide Shut.) Meirelles and Morgan’s version follows lovers through Paris, London, Bratislava, Rio, Denver and Phoenix.

The Deep Blue Sea, director Terence Davies

Another Rachel Weisz performance, more sexual intrigue, and another classic play as the basis, this time Terrence Rattigan’s 1952 play of the same title, which premiered with no less than Dame Peggy Ashcroft in the role Weisz plays in the film. Here, the lead character is paired with Tom Hiddleston (also in two Oscar bait film: Midnight In Paris & War Horse… as well as Thor) as the lover and Simon Russell Beale (one of England’s most acclaimed stage actors) as the spurned husband.

It’s been 11 years since Davies made a feature and this film marks the 100th birthday of the deceased playwright. Will it be this year’s End of The Affair or Far From Heaven? We’ll soon see.

Eye of the Storm, director Fred Schepisi

Schepisi, whose work ranges from The Chant of Jimmy Blacksmith to Roxanne to the dingo what ate Meryl’s baby, brought Last Orders to TIFF in 2000 and drew a lot of attention with an all-star cast of great character actors (including pre-Queen Mirren, Caine, Hoskins, Winstone, Courtenay, and a lovely return and farewell (he passed a couple years later, adding another dozen performances, but none of this level) by David Hemmings. But Sony Classics just couldn’t find an audience for the film.

His return to TIFF, 10 years later, shows a lot of promise. Charlotte Rampling is The Matriarch who has decided it’s time to die and Geoffrey Rush and Judy Davis are her “kids,” who want their piece of the family fortune. It’s based on a novel by Patrick White, the only Aussie who ever won the Nobel Prize in Literature.

Here is the trailer and a chat from the film’s premiere at the Melbourne International Film Festival.

Killer Joe, director William Friedkin

This is Friedkin’s second film of a Tracy Letts play. Since Bug, which got a bit lost because of its hard-to-market tone, Letts picked up a Pulitzer for the play, August: Osage, County. This time, things should be clearer for the marketing team, whoever it ends up being. Adapted by Letts from his first play, Matthew McConaughey is right in his sweet spot as a southern, smooth tough guy… the title character. Emile Hirsch is parented by Thomas Haden Church and Gina Gershon, who all plan a murder for which they want to hire Killer Joe. One of Sundance 2010’s IT girls, Juno Temple, plays the sister/daughter/bait.

Could Matthew McConaughey follow his pal Sandra Bullock to an unexpected Oscar slot?

The big problem here could be the level of sex and violence, which could turn on audiences and turn off Academy voters. But well only really know once we’ve seen the film.

The Lady , director Luc Besson

In the last dozen years, Luc Besson has become one of the most successful movie producers in the world… and a bit of an afterthought as a director. Since The Messenger in 1999, he’s only really directed one movie for adults, Angel-A, which barely got released in 2005. Since then, he’s built his empire, and focused his directing time on three Arthur & The Invisibles films and just last year, another comic book film, The Extraordinary Adventures of Adèle Blanc-Sec .

The Lady looks like a real movie. The true life story of Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi, who led her political party to victory in 1990 while under house arrest… a house arrest that went on for almost 15 years. Michelle Yeoh, almost unrecognizable, takes on the dramatic role.

Peace, Love, & Misunderstanding, director Bruce Beresford

This one smells of an Oscar role for Jane Fonda, who plays a hippie grandmother to Sundance co-IT girl Lizzie OIsen and Chace Crawford, and mom to a conservative Catherine Keener (who has to melt, right… but who wouldn’t want to watch her do it?).

It’s one of those movies that seems so obvious an opportunity for quality fun that will do excellent indie business that it’s a little scary that its heading to TIFF without distribution.

Rampart, director Oren Moverman

Just two years ago, after a lot of fighting to get the film out there by Oscilloscope Laboratories, Moverman’s film The Messenger (no relation to Besson’s) picked up two Oscar nominations, for screenplay and for Woody Harrelson. The duo returns with this story set in the real life tale of the corrupt Rampart police division in Los Angeles.

The cast is a killer, including Ben Foster, Sigourney Weaver, Steve Buscemi, and Robin Wright. The screenwriter is no one less than James Ellroy.

So why isn’t there a distributor? Maybe Harsh Times, the terrific little film with Christian Bale that went no where in a hurry a half-dozen years ago. But that film was tied up in a messy marriage of a new producer, a flailing distributor, etc.

Salmon Fishing in the Yemen, director Lasse Haalstrom

This one feels a bit like we have seen it before. Chocolat meets The Cider House Rules? Ewan McGregor is the scientist who is tasked with bringing salmon fishing to Yemen. Emily Blunt & Kristin Scott Thomas ensue.

Like any cliche, there is a reason why certain ideas become cliche. When they click, we LOVE them. (Well, audiences love them.) So what will this one be? Will is be sparkling or flat? Unlike an LA lunch, one option is definitively better than the other.

Shame, director Steve McQueen

McQueen’s first film was a masterpiece. Painful to experience, but really, masterpiece.

Who knows whether his second time out will be as difficult, but we do know that there is a theme of incest in the mix. Two of the world’s hottest young actors, Michael Fassbender and Carey Mulligan star.

I expect it to be tough. But Fassbender has been a superstar in wait, in terms of the US, and he gets to roll out the charismatic and the dramatic in this role. Mulligan is a consummate actress who got love for her sweet side and is apparently ready to take audiences somewhere darker. Audiences ran away from that in Never Let Me Go, which for me is easily her film best work to date… it just wasn’t charming.

I am not so surprised that distributors are scared to death of this film. But I am expecting greatness. I hope I’m not hoping for too much.

Take This Waltz – director Sarah Polley

It’s been 5 years between Sarah Polley movies. A lot of people have been waiting.

This time, her players are closer to her own age. Michelle Williams is the married woman who finds herself falling in love with another man. Seth Rogan and Sarah Silverman, seem (having not seen the film) to be stretching past their normally broad comic roles.

It will be nice to see Michelle Williams without the entire weight of the world on her shoulders… not that there won’t be drama.

The film seems to take its title from the Leonard Cohen song of the same name.

Of course, Moviefone went right for what they consider the most important story… Sarah Silverman telling them she’d be nude in the film. They quote her saying the same thing TWICE in this story. Apparently editors don’t work well with one hand on the keyboard. They’ll fit in well with HuffPo.

The film has, it seems, been offered around. Does that mean it’s not good, that taste levels are low, or that pricing for indie films is so rough these days that the best hope is to get some heat from Polley’s home country uberfest?

Be Sociable, Share!

11 Responses to “6 Weeks To TIFF: a 20 weeks to oscar prequel (part 2 of 3)”

  1. Tom says:

    Love Rachel Weisz, best actress of her generation.

  2. Mike says:

    There’s some good looking movies there. Rampart sounds like one to look out for.

  3. LexG says:

    1) Meirelles is a god.

    2) PLEASE tell me Rampart ISN’T Oscillioscope. PLEASE. PLEASE. PLEASE. It will ruin my LIFE if it is.

    3) Really, WHY would you title something “The Deep Blue Sea”? Of all the billion titles in the world, why ever re-use?

    4) I hate my job. GOD I wish I could see all these in a theater without worry of having to do work on the DVD before they’re released. Why am I one of TEN PEOPLE in LA who has this job, which is essentially my nightmare (ie, ruining new movies)?

  4. yancyskancy says:

    Ben Foster would have several Oscar nods under his belt by now if they had a “Most Acting” category.

  5. krazyeyes says:

    Your Moviefone comments seems a bit hypocritical considering the “who knows whether Winterbottom will go the full Pinto?” remark you included in your last TIFF round-up. Clearly this sort of reporting get hits.

    Plus, reducing Winterbottom down to the sum of 9 Songs and the “raincoat crowd” (however clever you were trying to be) is pretty disrespectful to a diverse and experimental body of work.

  6. David Poland says:

    krazyeyes… 1st… I never write anything for hit. Never have. I doubt that the Pinto comment drew a single extra eyeball.

    And I think there is a HUGE amount of difference between a comment inside a 1000+ word piece and a headline, “EXCLUSIVE: Sarah Silverman Doing Full-Frontal Nudity in ‘Take This Waltz’. Moreover, if you read the comment, it’s not even clear that she is being serious. There is no follow-up question and with someone like Sarah Silverman, no sense of her tone. So I don’t even know if that story is true.

    If I wrote a, “Hey… Frieda Pinto could be getting fucked a lot on camera” entry, I would happily cop to your comparison’s validity. As it is, I think you are defending Winterbottom – who is an interesting filmmaker with a longer history of failed experiments than successful ones – which is fine. I get that. It’s less clear whether Ms Pinto can act when a full performance is demanded of her. She’s a very nice woman and, obviously, a beautiful one.

    Anyway… I hear you…

  7. Not David Bordwell says:

    This is what I want to see:

    A Daniel Craig remake of On Her Majesty’s Secret Service with Rachel Weisz in the Diana Rigg role, and Bryan Cranston as Blofeld.

    MAKE IT HAPPEN.

  8. Danella Isaacs says:

    Could it just be a lousy economy keeping all these films distributor-less this late in the game? If it was one or two films, I’d worry about what it says about those films, but this seems like it might be something bigger than the quality of the films in question. Just wondering.

  9. JKill says:

    Pinto was very good and lovely in YOU WILL MEET A TALL DARK STRANGER.

  10. LexG says:

    She needs to be MORE BLONDE.

  11. CaptainZahn says:

    It’ll be nice to see Fonda in a role deserving of her talents again.

    She’s really looking great lately: http://www.harpersbazaar.com/magazine/feature-articles/jane-fonda-interview

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon