MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Review-ish: The Help

The Help is an old-fashioned bit of long-simmering movie stew where everyone is colored by their life experience, but good is pretty much good and bad is pretty much bad with enough character archetypes that there is someone for almost everyone (who’s not male) to identify with.

I liked it well enough. It got me choked up a half-dozen times for a half-dozen different reasons (who knew that a woman slapping a small child off camera would make me so pained?) and rarely surprised me in any real way. But this tiny slice of the south, where the civil rights war is close enough to smell, but permanent enough to make people lazy about their life inside of it, works as a summer diversion that works out what used to be worked out by reading a good paperback.

The highs and the lows of the film are represented by mediocre direction from a first timer (aside from a direct-to-video title that has a 3-screen, $7000 run) whose work is not disastrous, but adds little (though it is impossible to know how much credit to give him for the performances) and a cast that is truly, luxuriously, surprisingly remarkable.

Long-time readers have gone through my ranting about Emma Stone and Viola Davis alike. (You’ll be reading me touting the genius of Jean Dujardin for the next 6 months.) But neither is The Story here. Emma is really The Mary here. She gives a solid performance as the center of the universe of characters, spending a lot of frames reacting to the other characters. And Viola, who is like Green Lantern with a massive walloping fist coming out of what seems like nowhere to crush you emotionally, is The Rock on the other side. It’s a beautiful performance, but it’s almost all nuance and people don’t hold that in the kind of esteem they hold something showy.

Bryce Dallas Howard gives the best performance of her career… as a bitter, bitter bitch. Some will call her character a caricature, but I thought she played it beautifully, with tears and real pain always lingering behind her confident eyes. And Octavia Spencer, who has that unforgettable face, is the discovery on this film, walking the line between a very real, pained woman and the caricature of a southern mammy… when walking that line IS the character. My favorite parts of her performance are when she talks about doing something that everyone is laughing about, but which she truly considers an unchristian action on her part. She doesn’t overplay it. She knows why everyone else is laughing. But she carries it as a burden. Beautiful subtlety.

But for me, The Story of The Help is Jessica Chastain, who not only steals every scene she gets near with seemingly no effort at all, but set off a big light bulb for me… because it took me a while to figure out it was her. The last time I had one of these moments was with Rachel McAdams, whose performances in Wedding Crashers, The Notebook, Mean Girls, and The Hot Chick convinced me that she was The Next Great Actress… since all four performances were so strong… and none of them could really be connected to the actress in any of the other ones. She was (and is) both a striking movie beauty and a chameleon. And you don’t see that too often.

Chastain, in The Help, is a more connected version of Marilyn Monroe. She gets the moments here than Monroe never got… real pain… real desire… all while embodying a goofy white-trash bombshell whose entry in a simple dress turns every head in a room. In The Tree of Life, she is a young Sissy Spacek, perhaps a bit more patrician, a beautiful, loving, woman in a world she doesn’t control, but which she survives with a simple warmth and emotion. In Take Shelter, she dances with Michael Shannon, a reflection of where his character’s mind is going as the story progresses. And in The Debt, as a younger version of the Helen Mirren character, she minds her senior, but also creates a young woman who is both as fragile and as fierce as she must be to do what her character does. You might be able to connect the 3 redheads visually, but it is almost as though her face is different in each of the films. She lets us into the soul of her characters, as though each had a different set of eyes. And there is still Coriolanus due (after premiering at Berlin) at TIFF next month.

Chastain and Spencer and Davis and Howard can all be pushed hard for Oscar nominations for this film and two of them could get nominations. People will push back at mention of this film as an Oscar candidate. And indeed, with the new voting system and an early slot, Best Picture seems a long way from likely. But the performances are not only excellent, they are sticky. I’m not sure how a studio manages 4 runs in the same category on the same movie. I guess we’re about to find out.

And my advice on the film, which I have written elsewhere… if you find yourself wanting to go, based on the book or ads or the trailer, go. You will likely be happy you did. If you are turned off by any of that, don’t go. You will likely find more of what was bugging you. I have to respect a movie that knows what it is and delivers that to the people who want it, without trying to be more or to convince anyone of the value of the effort. I do wish David Gordon Green had directed. But that’s water under the bridge.

(Edited: To reflect Tate Taylor’s first film… at Don Murphy’s request.)

Be Sociable, Share!

12 Responses to “Review-ish: The Help”

  1. berg says:

    and don’t forget Chastain in Jolene …. sure The Help is saccharin race relations but that’s not my problem with the film …. my problem with the film is how the narrative revolves around the issue of whether a person is going to admit in public they “ate shit” …. that is mirrored in the way the help is forced to use a sweat box for a toilet in other scenes … for me the nostalgic happy go lucky tone of the piece is undermined by wacky sit com moments like all the commodes appearing overnight in one character’s lawn

  2. LexG says:

    Un-retire…

    That’s a whole lot of firecrotch in one movie.

    Re-retire.

    P.S. “The Debt” RULES, and I like Chastain MUCH better in that than in ToL.

  3. movieman says:

    I do wish David Gordon Green had directed.

    Or–and now here’s a radical concept to wrap your brain around–Peter Bogdanovich.
    Bogdanovich is probably the only director I can think of who might have given “The Help” the same taste, restraint and intelligence that Robert Mulligan brought to a true Southern/race relations classic, “To Kill a Mockingbird.”

  4. movieman says:

    But for the record, I’m perfectly OK with the movie the author’s childhood pal made of her book.
    With a cast like that, only an ungrateful fool would raise a bitch-snit.

  5. Don Murphy says:

    Hey David, how can he be a first time director when this is his second film? You get dumber every day!

  6. cadavra says:

    Movieman: The Big Book Of Film History will note that Bogdanovich, like his idol Orson Welles, was seldom given an opportunity (at least in his later years) to show us the greatness he’s still capable of.

  7. movieman says:

    So true, Cadavra.
    I could make a lengthy list of movies released over the past 30+ years that Bogdanovich would have been perfect for…and done a vastly better job than the actual director(s). Sadly enough, “The Help” is just the tip of the iceberg.
    Speaking of Welles, I just watched 1968’s “The Immortal Story” on TCM.
    I’m guessing the “neither-fish-now-fowl” 63-minute run time is the reason it’s not better known. But “IS” really is an essential work in Welles’ ouevre, as well as a clear and striking influence on many of Manoel de Oliveira’s latter films.

  8. David Poland says:

    Welcome back, Don. We haven’t had enough minor-issue-obsessiveness-just-to-be-a-prick around here lately. I made an edit to reflect Taylor’s direct-to-dvd title. Thanks so much for contributing in your limited way.

  9. cadavra says:

    Movieman: A few years ago, a producer friend was planning a movie (still unmade, sadly) based on a novel set in 1940s Hollywood. He called and asked if I had any ideas for a suitable director. I said, “Are you kidding? Bogdanovich!” Long, long pause, and then he replied, “Fuck, he never even occurred to me.” And so it goes.

  10. yancyskancy says:

    Dave has suggested some of the reasons Bogdanovich’s star fell; I also read once that he was canned by Tri-Star about a month into shooting the Wilder/Pryor film ANOTHER YOU in 1990. “Schedule delays” was the official reason, but supposedly Gene Wilder had decided he couldn’t continue working with him. I don’t know any further details.

  11. movieman says:

    Great anecdote, Cad!

  12. Valuable info. Fortunate me I found your web site by accident, and I’m stunned why this coincidence didn’t came about in advance! I bookmarked it.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon