MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Good Morning Toronto

And so it begins…

Running to get the press credential so I can rush to a 9:30a date will Melancholia. What a way to start the week.

The good news, so far, is that King Street is already feeling more like a festival village than last year. We’re staying at a Lightbox condo and the walk to the hotels where the press events will mostly all be is 3-4 blocks in one direction, the Scotiabank theater, 3 blocks in another direction, press office is 1 block away, and so on.

Last night, Dolby did a dog & pony for their 7.1 Surround system that they have installed in the Lightbox 1 theater. The clip they used to illustrate, from Samsara was pretty stunning. Ran into programmer Thom Powers later and he mentioned it as one of the must-see docs of the fest. (There are a lot this year. After the “every doc will make $10m” disappointment passed, we seem to be in a great moment for the form again.)

Heard a great rumor about MCN last night. Shhhh… don’t tell anyone.

Be Sociable, Share!

2 Responses to “Good Morning Toronto”

  1. Paul MD (Stella's Boy) says:

    Wish I was there. So jealous, though I did purchase my tickets to the Milwaukee International Film Festival yesterday. As of now going to see Natural Selection, We Need to Talk About Kevin, Mumbai Diaries, Like Crazy, and The Interrupters. Might sneak in a few more too.

  2. storymark says:

    Wow, so….. He’s gone full psycho now, is that it? Too much time hanging with robots.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

It shows how out of it I was in trying to be in it, acknowledging that I was out of it to myself, and then thinking, “Okay, how do I stop being out of it? Well, I get some legitimate illogical narrative ideas” — some novel, you know?

So I decided on three writers that I might be able to option their material and get some producer, or myself as producer, and then get some writer to do a screenplay on it, and maybe make a movie.

And so the three projects were “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep,” “Naked Lunch” and a collection of Bukowski. Which, in 1975, forget it — I mean, that was nuts. Hollywood would not touch any of that, but I was looking for something commercial, and I thought that all of these things were coming.

There would be no Blade Runner if there was no Ray Bradbury. I couldn’t find Philip K. Dick. His agent didn’t even know where he was. And so I gave up.

I was walking down the street and I ran into Bradbury — he directed a play that I was going to do as an actor, so we know each other, but he yelled “hi” — and I’d forgot who he was.

So at my girlfriend Barbara Hershey’s urging — I was with her at that moment — she said, “Talk to him! That guy really wants to talk to you,” and I said “No, fuck him,” and keep walking.

But then I did, and then I realized who it was, and I thought, “Wait, he’s in that realm, maybe he knows Philip K. Dick.” I said, “You know a guy named—” “Yeah, sure — you want his phone number?”

My friend paid my rent for a year while I wrote, because it turned out we couldn’t get a writer. My friends kept on me about, well, if you can’t get a writer, then you write.”
~ Hampton Fancher

“That was the most disappointing thing to me in how this thing was played. Is that I’m on the phone with you now, after all that’s been said, and the fundamental distinction between what James is dealing with in these other cases is not actually brought to the fore. The fundamental difference is that James Franco didn’t seek to use his position to have sex with anyone. There’s not a case of that. He wasn’t using his position or status to try to solicit a sexual favor from anyone. If he had — if that were what the accusation involved — the show would not have gone on. We would have folded up shop and we would have not completed the show. Because then it would have been the same as Harvey Weinstein, or Les Moonves, or any of these cases that are fundamental to this new paradigm. Did you not notice that? Why did you not notice that? Is that not something notable to say, journalistically? Because nobody could find the voice to say it. I’m not just being rhetorical. Why is it that you and the other critics, none of you could find the voice to say, “You know, it’s not this, it’s that”? Because — let me go on and speak further to this. If you go back to the L.A. Times piece, that’s what it lacked. That’s what they were not able to deliver. The one example in the five that involved an issue of a sexual act was between James and a woman he was dating, who he was not working with. There was no professional dynamic in any capacity.

~ David Simon